ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2023
Performance of Bayesian Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve-Based Pharmacokinetic Dosing Based on a One-Compartment Model and Trough-Only Monitoring for Vancomycin.
Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel Bayesian method was developed to interpret serum vancomycin concentrations (SVCs) following the administration of one or more vancomycin doses with potential varying doses and intervals based on superposition principles. The method was evaluated using retrospective data from 442 subjects from three hospitals. The patients were required to receive vancomycin for more than 3 days, have stable renal function (fluctuation in serum creatinine of ≤0.3 mg/dL), and have at least 2 trough concentrations reported. Pharmacokinetic parameters were predicted using the first SVC, and the fitted parameters were then used to predict subsequent SVCs. Using only covariate-adjusted population prior estimates, the first two SVC prediction errors were 47.3 to 54.7% for the scaled mean absolute error (sMAE) and 62.1 to 67.8% for the scaled root mean squared error (sRMSE). "Scaled" refers to the division of the MAE or RMSE by the mean value. The Bayesian method had minimal errors for the first SVC (by design), and for the second SVC, the sMAE was 8.95%, and the sRMSE was 36.5%. The predictive performance of the Bayesian method did degrade with subsequent SVCs, which we attributed to time-dependent pharmacokinetics. The 24-h area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) was determined from simulated concentrations before and after the first SVC was reported. Prior to the first SVC, 170 (38.4%) patients had a 24-h AUC of <400 mg · h/L, 186 (42.1%) had a 24-h AUC within the target range, and 86 (19.5%) had a 24-h AUC of >600 mg · h/L. After the first SVC was reported, 322 (72.9%) had a 24-h AUC within the target range, 68 (15.4%) had low values, and 52 (11.8%) had high values based on the model simulation. Target attainments were 38% before the first SVC and 73% after the first SVC. The hospitals had no policies or procedures in place for targeting 24-h AUCs, although the trough target was typically 13 to 17 mg/L. Our data provide evidence of time-dependent pharmacokinetics, which will require regular therapeutic drug monitoring regardless of the method used to interpret SVCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.