Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37133244›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2023

Role of actor networks in primary health care implementation in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Dominic Dormenyo Gadeka, Patricia Akweongo, Eleanor Whyle, Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey, Justice Moses Aheto, Lucy Gilson

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Dominic Dormenyo GadekaDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon-Accra, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0002-1583-4572
Patricia AkweongoDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon-Accra, Ghana.
Eleanor WhyleDivision of Health Policy and Systems, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Genevieve Cecilia AryeeteyDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon-Accra, Ghana.
Justice Moses AhetoDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Ghana School of Public Health, Legon-Accra, Ghana.
Lucy GilsonDivision of Health Policy and Systems, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
University of Ghana · GHUniversity of Cape Town · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary health care (PHC) improvement is often undermined by implementation gaps in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). The influence that actor networks might have on the implementation has received little attention up to this point.

objectiveThis study sought to offer insights about actor networks and how they support PHC implementation in LMICs.

methodsWe reviewed primary studies that utilised social network analysis (SNA) to determine actor networks and their influence on aspects of PHC in LMICs following the five-stage scoping review methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley. Narrative synthesis was applied to describe the included studies and the results.

resultsThirteen primary studies were found eligible for this review. Ten network types were identified from the included papers across different contexts and actors: professional advice networks, peer networks, support/supervisory networks, friendship networks, referral networks, community health committee (CHC) networks, inter-sectoral collaboration networks, partnership networks, communications networks, and inter-organisational network. The networks were found to support PHC implementation at patient/household or community-level, health facility-level and multi-partner networks that work across levels. The study demonstrates that: (1) patient/household or community-level networks promote early health-seeking, continuity of care and inclusiveness by enabling network members (actors) the support that ensures access to PHC services, (2) health facility-level networks enable collaboration among PHC staff and also ensure the building of social capital that enhances accountability and access to community health services, and (3) multi-partner networks that work across levels promote implementation by facilitating information and resource sharing, high professional trust and effective communication among actors.

conclusionThis body of literature reviewed suggests that, actor networks exist across different levels and that they make a difference in PHC implementation. Social Network Analysis may be a useful approach to health policy analysis (HPA) on implementation.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPrimary Health CareCommunity Health ServicesHealth PolicyHumansactor networkshealth policy analysisPolicy implementationprimary health caresocial network analysis

Identifiers

PMID37133244
PMCPMC10158548
OpenAlexW4367833823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.