ReviewThe neuroradiology journal2024
Magnetic resonance relaxometry in quantitative imaging of brain gliomas: A literature review.
Review in The neuroradiology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-Dimensional quantitative analysis of the Peri-Enhancing zone reveals ADC and CBV signatures of glioblastoma recurrence.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2026Article
- MRI-based human brain atlases of R1, R2, proton density, and myelin volume fraction using synthetic quantitative imaging at 1.5 T.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Synthetic MR: Clinical applications in neuroradiology.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- A Histopathologic Correlation Study Evaluating Glymphatic Function in Brain Tumors by Multiparametric MRI.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024Article
- Review
- Novel advanced imaging techniques for cerebral oedema.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance (MR) relaxometry is a quantitative imaging method that measures tissue relaxation properties. This review discusses the state of the art of clinical proton MR relaxometry for glial brain tumors. Current MR relaxometry technology also includes MR fingerprinting and synthetic MRI, which solve the inefficiencies and challenges of earlier techniques. Despite mixed results regarding its capability for brain tumor differential diagnosis, there is growing evidence that MR relaxometry can differentiate between gliomas and metastases and between glioma grades. Studies of the peritumoral zones have demonstrated their heterogeneity and possible directions of tumor infiltration. In addition, relaxometry offers T2* mapping that can define areas of tissue hypoxia not discriminated by perfusion assessment. Studies of tumor therapy response have demonstrated an association between survival and progression terms and dynamics of native and contrast-enhanced tumor relaxometric profiles. In conclusion, MR relaxometry is a promising technique for glial tumor diagnosis, particularly in association with neuropathological studies and other imaging techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.