Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37132461›Full record

ArticleWaste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA2023

Comparison of different waste bin monitoring approaches: An exploratory study.

Yoeri Brouwer, Ana Paula Barbosa-Póvoa, António Pais Antunes, Tânia Rodrigues Pereira Ramos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yoeri BrouwerDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ana Paula Barbosa-PóvoaCentre for Management Studies (CEGIST), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
António Pais AntunesCITTA, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Tânia Rodrigues Pereira RamosCentre for Management Studies (CEGIST), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2321-2431

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste bin monitoring solutions are an essential step towards smart cities. This study presents an exploratory analysis of two waste bin monitoring approaches: (1) ultrasonic sensors installed in the bins and (2) visual observations (VO) of the waste collection truck drivers. Bin fill level data was collected from a Portuguese waste management company. A comparative statistical analysis of the two datasets (VO and sensor observations) was performed and a predictive model based on Gaussian processes was applied to enable a trade-off analysis of the number of collections versus the number of overflows for each monitoring approach. The results demonstrate that the VO are valuable and reveal that significant improvements can be achieved for either of the monitoring approaches in relation to the current situation. A monitoring approach based on VO combined with a predictive model is shown to be viable and leads to a considerable reduction in the number of collections and overflows. This approach can enable waste collection companies to improve their collection operations with minimal investment costs during their transition to fully sensorized bins.

Indexed as

Refuse DisposalWaste ManagementCitiesCosts and Cost Analysiscollection efficiencymonitoring solutionsservice levelSmart citieswaste management

Identifiers

PMID37132461
PMCPMC10517583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.