Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37132372›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2023

Lights, fluorescence, action-Influencing wound treatment plans including debridement of bacteria and biofilms.

Ashley Jacob, Laura M Jones, Raymond J Abdo, Sebastian F Cruz-Schiavone, Robert Skerker, Wayne J Caputo, Nathan Krehbiel, Audrey K Moyer-Harris, Alyssa McAtee, Isabel Baker and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A Scoping Review of Fluorescence Imaging: A Promising New Technology for Bacterial Detection in Burn Wounds.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ashley JacobMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura M JonesMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Raymond J AbdoSt. Louis Foot & Ankle, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Sebastian F Cruz-SchiavoneAdamant Medical Group, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Robert SkerkerAtlantic Health, Morristown, New Jersey, USA.
Wayne J CaputoClara Maass Medical Center, Belleville, New Jersey, USA.
Nathan KrehbielMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Audrey K Moyer-HarrisMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alyssa McAteeAgiliti Health, Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Isabel BakerMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Micaela D GrayMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Monique Y RennieMolecuLight Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High bacterial loads within chronic wounds increase the risk of infection and complication. Detection and localization of bacterial loads through point-of-care fluorescence (FL) imaging can objectively inform and support bacterial treatment decisions. This single time-point, retrospective analysis describes the treatment decisions made on 1000 chronic wounds (DFUs, VLUs, PIs, surgical wounds, burns, and others) at 211 wound-care facilities across 36 US states. Clinical assessment findings and treatment plans derived from them, as well as subsequent FL-imaging (MolecuLight®) findings and any associated treatment plan changes, were recorded for analysis. FL signals indicating elevated bacterial loads were observed in 701 wounds (70.8%), while only 293 (29.6%) showed signs/symptoms of infection. After FL-imaging, treatment plans changed in 528 wounds as follows: more extensive debridement (18.7%), more extensive hygiene (17.2%), FL-targeted debridement (17.2%), new topical therapies (10.1%), new systemic antibiotic prescriptions (9.0%), FL-guided sampling for microbiological analysis (6.2%), and changes in dressing selection (3.2%). These real-world findings of asymptomatic bacterial load/biofilm incidence, and of the frequent treatment plan changes post-imaging, are in accordance with clinical trial findings using this technology. These data, from a range of wound types, facilities, and clinician skill sets, suggest that point-of-care FL-imaging information improves bacterial infection management.

Indexed as

Wound InfectionBacteriaBiofilmsDebridementHumansRetrospective Studiesbacterial fluorescence imagingbacterial loadsbiofilmMolecuLightwounds

Identifiers

PMID37132372
PMCPMC10502265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.