Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37132041›Full record

ReviewGeriatrics & gerontology international2023

Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.

Sameh Eltaybani, Satomi Kitamura, Chie Fukui, Ayumi Igarashi, Mariko Sakka, Maiko Noguchi-Watanabe, Manami Takaoka, Asa Inagaki, Taisuke Yasaka, Hiromi Kobayashi and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sameh EltaybaniDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-4578
Satomi KitamuraDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Chie FukuiDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Ayumi IgarashiDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Mariko SakkaDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Maiko Noguchi-WatanabeDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Manami TakaokaDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Asa InagakiDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Taisuke YasakaDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi KobayashiDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko Yamamoto-MitaniDepartment of Gerontological Home Care and Long-term Care Nursing, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Health Care University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Grant for Geriatric Health Promotion Project provided by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare 21GA1002JSPS KAKENHI JP18K18446
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCare quality in Japan's long-term care (LTC) agencies, including home care, is the responsibility primarily of individual agencies, and the evaluation of service processes and outcomes is minimal.

objectivesTo describe the development of quality indicators for LTC (QIs-LTC) in Japan.

methodsQIs-LTC were developed through literature review and expert panel discussions and then were piloted and used in a 2-year longitudinal survey. The survey (launched in September 2019) targeted older people receiving home care (n = 1450), their family members (n = 880), their professional home care providers (n = 577), and managers of home care agencies (n = 122).

resultsAcross eight domains (maintaining dignity, minimizing symptoms and disease deterioration, maintaining nutritional status, maintaining bladder/bowel control, encouraging physical activities, experiencing sound sleep, maintaining serenity and contentedness, and maintaining family's well-being), 24 care quality objectives were set with 24 outcome QIs-LTC and 144 process QIs-LTC. In the survey, 84.8% of clients were using home care nursing, 26.3% were living alone, and 39.5% had dementia. In the month preceding the data collection, 13.9% of clients had a new disease or worsening of an existing disease, 8.8% were hospitalized at least once, and 47.9% did not participate in activities of interest. About 20% of clients' families were unable to spend time peacefully, and 52.8% were exhausted from the client's care.

conclusionsThe QIs-LTC developed in the current study are generic and client- and family-centered. They encompass objective and subjective information and would facilitate standardized monitoring if adopted and comparison between LTC settings, including home care. In addition, future research directives are outlined. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 383-394.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesQuality Indicators, Health CareAgedHumansJapanLong-Term CareProspective StudiesQuality of Health Carehome carelongitudinal surveylong-term careolder peoplequality indicators

Identifiers

PMID37132041
PMCPMC11503618
OpenAlexW4362608162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.