ReviewGeriatrics & gerontology international2023
Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.
Review in Geriatrics & gerontology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Association Between Home-Visit Nursing Use and the Incidence of Potentially Avoidable Hospitalisation and Its Duration Among Community-Dwelling Older People: A 12-Month Prospective Cohort Study.International journal of older people nursing · 2026Article
- Reply to comment on: Role of education in enhancing home care nurses' assessment skills: A closer look at key findings.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Article
- The Longitudinal Effects of Low Body Mass Index on Unfavorable Physical Health Outcomes Among Older Adults Receiving Homecare Nursing: A Prospective Cohort Study.Research in nursing & health · 2025Article
- The meaning of 'quality' of homecare for older people: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Association between education for home care nurses and their practice of comprehensive client assessment: A cross-sectional study.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Article
- Assessing the reliability and feasibility of quality indicators used to evaluate long-term care for older adults.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2025Article
- Exploring a career pathway for home support workers in Ireland: a systematic scoping review of the international evidence.Frontiers in health services · 2024Article
- Toward developing care outcome quality indicators for home care for older people: A prospective cohort study in Japan.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCare quality in Japan's long-term care (LTC) agencies, including home care, is the responsibility primarily of individual agencies, and the evaluation of service processes and outcomes is minimal.
objectivesTo describe the development of quality indicators for LTC (QIs-LTC) in Japan.
methodsQIs-LTC were developed through literature review and expert panel discussions and then were piloted and used in a 2-year longitudinal survey. The survey (launched in September 2019) targeted older people receiving home care (n = 1450), their family members (n = 880), their professional home care providers (n = 577), and managers of home care agencies (n = 122).
resultsAcross eight domains (maintaining dignity, minimizing symptoms and disease deterioration, maintaining nutritional status, maintaining bladder/bowel control, encouraging physical activities, experiencing sound sleep, maintaining serenity and contentedness, and maintaining family's well-being), 24 care quality objectives were set with 24 outcome QIs-LTC and 144 process QIs-LTC. In the survey, 84.8% of clients were using home care nursing, 26.3% were living alone, and 39.5% had dementia. In the month preceding the data collection, 13.9% of clients had a new disease or worsening of an existing disease, 8.8% were hospitalized at least once, and 47.9% did not participate in activities of interest. About 20% of clients' families were unable to spend time peacefully, and 52.8% were exhausted from the client's care.
conclusionsThe QIs-LTC developed in the current study are generic and client- and family-centered. They encompass objective and subjective information and would facilitate standardized monitoring if adopted and comparison between LTC settings, including home care. In addition, future research directives are outlined. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2023; 23: 383-394.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.