Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131954›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023

Harmonizing CT Images via Physics-based Deep Neural Networks.

Mojtaba Zarei, Saman Sotoudeh-Paima, Cindy McCabe, Ehsan Abadi, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Harmonization: A Systematic Analysis of Various Task-based Scenarios.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Inter-vendor harmonization of CT reconstruction kernels using unpaired image translation.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mojtaba ZareiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine.
Saman Sotoudeh-PaimaCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine.
Cindy McCabeCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine.
Ehsan AbadiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine.
Ehsan SameiCenter for Virtual Imaging Trials, Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Accuracy and Precision in CT Quantification of COPD Through Virtual Imaging TrialsR01HL155293 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ABADI, EHSAN · 2021 to 2025
$2.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL155293NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rendition of medical images influences the accuracy and precision of quantifications. Image variations or biases make measuring imaging biomarkers challenging. The objective of this paper is to reduce the variability of computed tomography (CT) quantifications for radiomics and biomarkers using physics-based deep neural networks (DNNs). With the proposed framework, it is possible to harmonize the different renditions of a single CT scan (with variations in reconstruction kernel and dose) into an image that is in close agreement with the ground truth. To this end, a generative adversarial network (GAN) model was developed where the generator is informed by the scanner's modulation transfer function (MTF). To train the network, a virtual imaging trial (VIT) platform was used to acquire CT images, from a set of forty computational models (XCAT) serving as the patient model. Phantoms with varying levels of pulmonary disease, such as lung nodules and emphysema, were used. We scanned the patient models with a validated CT simulator (DukeSim) modeling a commercial CT scanner at 20 and 100 mAs dose levels and then reconstructed the images by twelve kernels representing smooth to sharp kernels. An evaluation of the harmonized virtual images was conducted in four different ways: 1) visual quality of the images, 2) bias and variation in density-based biomarkers, 3) bias and variation in morphological-based biomarkers, and 4) Noise Power Spectrum (NPS) and lung histogram. The trained model harmonized the test set images with a structural similarity index of 0.95±0.1, a normalized mean squared error of 10.2±1.5%, and a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 31.8±1.5 dB. Moreover, emphysema-based imaging biomarkers of LAA-950 (-1.5±1.8), Perc15 (13.65±9.3), and Lung mass (0.1±0.3) had more precise quantifications.

Identifiers

PMID37131954
PMCPMC10149034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.