Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131881›Full record

ArticleArXiv2023

Deep-Learning-based Fast and Accurate 3D CT Deformable Image Registration in Lung Cancer.

Yuzhen Ding, Hongying Feng, Yunze Yang, Jason Holmes, Zhengliang Liu, David Liu, William W Wong, Nathan Y Yu, Terence T Sio, Steven E Schild and 2 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuzhen DingDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Hongying FengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Yunze YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Jason HolmesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Zhengliang LiuDepartment of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
David LiuAthens Academy, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
William W WongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Nathan Y YuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Terence T SioDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Steven E SchildDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
Baoxin LiSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA 85281.
Wei LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

Funding

4D Robust Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Proton TherapyK25CA168984 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIU, WEI · 2012 to 2015
$450k
NCI NIH HHS K25 CA168984
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn some proton therapy facilities, patient alignment relies on two 2D orthogonal kV images, taken at fixed, oblique angles, as no 3D on-the-bed imaging is available. The visibility of the tumor in kV images is limited since the patient's 3D anatomy is projected onto a 2D plane, especially when the tumor is behind high-density structures such as bones. This can lead to large patient setup errors. A solution is to reconstruct the 3D CT image from the kV images obtained at the treatment isocenter in the treatment position.

methodsAn asymmetric autoencoder-like network built with vision-transformer blocks was developed. The data was collected from 1 head and neck patient: 2 orthogonal kV images (1024x1024 voxels), 1 3D CT with padding (512x512x512) acquired from the in-room CT-on-rails before kVs were taken and 2 digitally-reconstructed-radiograph (DRR) images (512x512) based on the CT. We resampled kV images every 8 voxels and DRR and CT every 4 voxels, thus formed a dataset consisting of 262,144 samples, in which the images have a dimension of 128 for each direction. In training, both kV and DRR images were utilized, and the encoder was encouraged to learn the jointed feature map from both kV and DRR images. In testing, only independent kV images were used. The full-size synthetic CT (sCT) was achieved by concatenating the sCTs generated by the model according to their spatial information. The image quality of the synthetic CT (sCT) was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference volume histogram (CDVH).

resultsThe model achieved a speed of 2.1s and a MAE of <40HU. The CDVH showed that <5% of the voxels had a per-voxel-absolute-CT-number-difference larger than 185 HU.

conclusionA patient-specific vision-transformer-based network was developed and shown to be accurate and efficient to reconstruct 3D CT images from kV images.

Identifiers

PMID37131881
PMCPMC10153353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.