ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
Interpretable deep learning approach for extracting cognitive features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons in older adults.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hand drawing involves multiple neural systems for planning and precise control of sequential movements, making it a valuable cognitive test for older adults. However, conventional visual assessment of drawings may not capture intricate nuances that could help track cognitive states. To address this issue, we utilized a deep-learning model, PentaMind, to examine cognition-related features from hand-drawn images of intersecting pentagons. PentaMind, trained on 13,777 images from 3,111 participants in three aging cohorts, explained 23.3% of the variance in global cognitive scores, a comprehensive hour-long cognitive battery. The model’s performance, which was 1.92 times more accurate than conventional visual assessment, significantly improved the detection of cognitive decline. The improvement in accuracy was due to capturing additional drawing features that we found to be associated with motor impairments and cerebrovascular pathologies. By systematically modifying the input images, we discovered several important drawing attributes for cognition, including line waviness. Our results demonstrate that hand-drawn images can provide rich cognitive information, enabling rapid assessment of cognitive decline and suggesting potential clinical implications in dementia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.