ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023
A statistical learning method for simultaneous copy number estimation and subclone clustering with single cell sequencing data.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The availability of single cell sequencing (SCS) enables us to assess intra-tumor heterogeneity and identify cellular subclones without the confounding effect of mixed cells. Copy number aberrations (CNAs) have been commonly used to identify subclones in SCS data using various clustering methods, since cells comprising a subpopulation are found to share genetic profile. However, currently available methods may generate spurious results (e.g., falsely identified CNAs) in the procedure of CNA detection, hence diminishing the accuracy of subclone identification from a large complex cell population. In this study, we developed a CNA detection method based on a fused lasso model, referred to as FLCNA, which can simultaneously identify subclones in single cell DNA sequencing (scDNA-seq) data. Spike-in simulations were conducted to evaluate the clustering and CNA detection performance of FLCNA benchmarking to existing copy number estimation methods (SCOPE, HMMcopy) in combination with the existing and commonly used clustering methods. Interestingly, application of FLCNA to a real scDNA-seq dataset of breast cancer revealed remarkably different genomic variation patterns in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated samples and pre-treated samples. We show that FLCNA is a practical and powerful method in subclone identification and CNA detection with scDNA-seq data.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.