ArticleResearch square2023
Patient Characteristics Associated with Definitive Diagnosis of Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer in Those Initially Diagnosed with Cancer of Unknown Primary.
Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is the fourth most common cause of cancer mortality in the U.S. Median survival after CUP diagnosis is 3-4 months. As CUP and metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) are comparable in prevalence and survival, PC diagnosis is a useful endpoint to assess patient characteristics associated with definitive diagnosis in older patients who initially present with CUP. Methods: This study used 2010-2015 SEER-Medicare data. Logistic regression models compared patient characteristics who received definitive diagnosis in two subsets: CUP-PC and PC only. Results: Approximately 26% of patients who received a definitive diagnosis of metastatic pancreatic cancer started with an initial diagnosis of CUP (n=17,565). The odds of definitive diagnosis in CUP-PC were lower for those with a comorbidity score of 0 (OR 0.85 [0.79, 0.91]) and epithelial/unspecified histology (OR 0.76 [0.71, 0.82]). The odds of definitive diagnosis in CUP-PC were higher for patients of Other race (OR 1.27 [1.13, 1.43]) compared to White patients. Conclusion: Definitive diagnosis of CUP-PC was favorable in patients in the Other race category with fewer or no comorbidities. Unfavorable characteristics included older patients and those with epithelial/unspecified histology. Future studies will focus on patterns of care and survival in patients with CUP-PC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.