Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131530›Full record

ArticleJournal of banking & finance2023

The COVID-19 shock and consumer credit: Evidence from credit card data.

Akos Horvath, Benjamin Kay, Carlo Wix

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of banking & finance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. COVID-19, bank deposits, and lending.Journal of empirical finance · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Debt-relief programs and money left on the table: Evidence from Canada's response to COVID-19.The Canadian journal of economics. Revue canadienne d'economique · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Banking research in the time of COVID-19.Journal of financial stability · 2021
    Article
  9. COVID-19 and lending responses of European banks.Journal of banking & finance · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Akos HorvathFederal Reserve Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC 2055, United States.
Benjamin KayFederal Reserve Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC 2055, United States.
Carlo WixFederal Reserve Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue N.W., Washington, DC 2055, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We study the dynamic effect of the COVID-19 shock on credit card use in 2020. Local case incidence had a strong negative effect on credit card spending in the early months of the pandemic, which diminished over time. This time-varying pattern was driven by the fear of the virus, rather than government support programs, consistent with the "pandemic fatigue" of consumers. Local pandemic severity also had a strong effect on credit card repayments. These spending and repayment effects offset each other, resulting in no effect on credit card borrowing, consistent with credit-smoothing behavior. The local stringency of nonpharmaceutical interventions also had a negative effect on spending and repayments, albeit smaller in magnitude. We conclude that the pandemic itself was a more important driver of changes in credit card use than the public health policy response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Credit card useCredit-smoothingHousehold spending and borrowingNonpharmaceutical interventions

Identifiers

PMID37131530
PMCPMC10122565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.