ArticleHeliyon2023
Gabapentin for chronic refractory cough: A system review and meta-analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of behavioral cough suppression therapy for refractory chronic cough or unexplained chronic cough: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Therapeutic advances in respiratory diseasePooled it
- Patterns and Characteristics of Gabapentin Use Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Drugs & aging · 2025Article
- Cough and dyspnea management in pulmonary fibrosis.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in the treatment of chronic refractory cough by Meta-Analysis. Methods: Literatures were retrieved from PubMed, Embase (OvidIP), Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database and China Biomedical Management System and eligible prospective studies were screened. Data were extracted and analyzed by using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results: Six articles (2 RCTs and 4 prospective studies) with 536 participants were finally included. Meta-analysis showed that gabapentin was better than placebo in cough-specific quality of life (LCQ score, MD = 4.02, 95%CI [3.26,4,78], Z = 10.34, P < 0.00001), cough severity (VAS score, MD = -29.36, 95% CI (-39.46, -19.26), Z = 5.7, P < 0.00001), cough frequency (MD = -29.87, 95% CI [- 43.84, -15.91], Z = 4.19, P < 0.0001) and therapeutic efficacy (RR = 1.37,95%CI [1.13,1.65], Z = 3.27, P = 0.001), and equal in safety (RR = 1.32,95%CI [0.47,3.7], Z = 0.53, P = 0.59). Gabapentin was similar to other neuromodulators in therapeutic efficacy (RR = 1.07,95%CI [0.87,1.32], Z = 0.64, P = 0.52), but its safety was better. Conclusion: Gabapentin is effective in the treatment of chronic refractory cough in both subjective and objective evaluations, and its safety is better than other neuromodulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.