ArticleHeliyon2023
An asymmetric nexus between clean energy, good governance, education and inward FDI in China: Do environment and technology matter? Evidence for chines provincial data.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mitigating environmental pollution in China: Unlocking the potential for high-quality innovation.iScience · 2024Article
- The spatial spillover effects of clean energy consumption and production on sustainable economic development in China.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- The impact of FDI on energy conservation and emission reduction performance: A FDI quality perspective.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inflows of FDI has revealed a catalyst effect on economic progress with sustainability. Furthermore, continual inflows of FDI prompts. The motivation of the study is to evaluate the effects of energy, good governance, education, and environmental regulation on inflows of FDI in china for the period 1997-2018. A panel data econometrical technique has been implemented, including panel unit root, cointegration, CS-ARDL, and asymmetric ARDL. Moreover, the directional causality has been investigated by employing the H-D causality test. According to the coefficients for CS-ARDL, the study documented a positive statistically significant linkage between explanatory variables, i.e., good governance, education, and energy, and explained variables, especially in the long run, whereas environmental regulation established an adverse association with FDI inflows in China. In terms of the standard Wald test, the study confirms the asymmetric linkage between explanatory variables and FDI in the long-run and short-run estimation. Referring to the asymmetric coefficients of good governance, education, and energy revealed a positive tie with inflows of FDI, while a negative statistically significant connection was disclosed between environmental regulation and inflows of FDI. Furthermore, directional casualty test established asymmetric shocks in CE [FDI←→
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.