Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131420›Full record

ArticleCampbell systematic reviews2020

PROTOCOL: Friendly visiting by a volunteer for reducing loneliness and social isolation in older adults.

Jorien Laermans, Hans Scheers, Philippe Vandekerckhove, Emmy De Buck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Campbell systematic reviews, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jorien LaermansCentre for Evidence-Based Practice Belgian Red Cross Mechelen Belgium.
Hans ScheersCentre for Evidence-Based Practice Belgian Red Cross Mechelen Belgium.
Philippe VandekerckhoveBelgian Red Cross Mechelen Belgium.
Emmy De BuckCentre for Evidence-Based Practice Belgian Red Cross Mechelen Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness and social isolation are reaching epidemic proportions in both children and adults, despite the increasing connectedness in our twenty-first century world. As a growing number of studies reveal their detrimental impact on physical and mental health, identifying and investing in feasible and sustainable interventions to alleviate social isolation and feelings of loneliness is of prime importance. Friendly visiting, a befriending intervention whereby older persons are matched with someone who visits them on a regular basis, seems to be a realistic and sustainable option for providing social support. However, until this day, it remains unclear if friendly visiting by a volunteer is effective at reducing loneliness and social isolation. Therefore, this systematic review aims to answer the following research question: what is the effect of friendly visiting by a volunteer on feelings of loneliness and social isolation (primary outcomes) and wellbeing (i.e. life satisfaction, depressive symptom experiencing and mental health; secondary outcomes) in older adults? The results of this review may provide useful information to policy-makers that are preparing to take on one the most challenging social issues facing our ageing society.

Identifiers

PMID37131420
PMCPMC8356329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.