ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023
Influence of obstructions on obstacle-crossing motion during walking.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-Reported Dietary Carotenoid Intake and Skin Carotenoid Score Status in a Geographically Diverse U.S. Sample.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Skin Carotenoid Status and Diet Quality in Professional Rugby League Players: An Exploratory Longitudinal Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Virtual Reality for Balance in Individuals With Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Assessment and Intervention Strategies.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2025Review
- Effects of Task Interference on Kinematics and Dual-Task Cost of Running in Early Childhood.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the presence of obstructions changes the crossing motion during walking based on the visual perception of obstacles. [Participants and Methods] We included 25 healthy university students as the participants in this study. They were asked to step over obstacles while walking under two conditions i.e., with obstruction and without obstruction. We analyzed the distance between the foot and obstacle (clearance), trajectory of foot pressure movement and distribution as measured by a foot pressure distribution measurement system, and stance phase time. [Results] No significant differences were found between the two conditions for either clearance or foot pressure distribution. In other words, no difference in crossing motion was observed after visual recognition of the obstacle, both in the presence or absence of the obstruction. [Conclusion] The results suggest that no differences exist in the accuracy of recognizing visual information about an obstacle through different mechanisms of selective visual attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.