Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131260›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2023

Benefits of maternally-administered infant massage for mothers of hospitalized preterm infants: a scoping review.

Dana B McCarty, Sandra Willett, Mary Kimmel, Stacey C Dusing

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The state of infant massage use in neonatal intensive care units.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dana B McCartyDepartment of Health Sciences, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 3024 Bondurant Hall, CB#7135, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7135, USA. dana_mccarty@med.unc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6499-8197
Sandra WillettDepartment of Physical Therapy, Munroe-Meyer Institute, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.
Mary KimmelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA.
Stacey C DusingDivision of Biokinesiology and Physical Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USNebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

North Carolina Translational and Clinical Science Institute (NC TraCS) KL2KL2TR002490 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI WEINBERGER, MORRIS · 2018 to 2022
$11.0M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002490NCCIH NIH HHS 3KL2TR002490-02S1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesInfant massage (IM) is a well-studied, safe intervention known to benefit infants born preterm. Less is known about the benefits of maternally-administrated infant massage for mothers of preterm infants who often experience increased rates of anxiety and depression in their infants' first year of life. This scoping review summarizes the extent, nature, and type of evidence linking IM and parent-centered outcomes.

methodsThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) protocol was followed using three databases: PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL. Thirteen manuscripts evaluating 11 separate study cohorts met pre-specified inclusion criteria.

resultsSix primary topics related to the influence of infant massage on parent outcomes emerged: 1) anxiety, 2) perceived stress, 3) depressive symptoms, 4) maternal-infant interaction, 5) maternal satisfaction, and 6) maternal competence. Emerging evidence supports that infant massage, when administered by mothers, benefits mothers of preterm infants by reducing anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms and improving maternal-infant interactions in the short-term, but there is limited evidence to support its effectiveness on these outcomes in longer periods of follow-up. Based on effect size calculations in small study cohorts, maternally-administered IM may have a moderate to large effect size on maternal perceived stress and depressive symptoms.

conclusionsMaternally-administered IM may benefit mothers of preterm infants by reducing anxiety, stress, depressive symptoms, and by improving maternal-infant interactions in the short-term. Additional research with larger cohorts and robust design is needed to understand the potential relationship between IM and parental outcomes.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionInfant massageMaternal-infant interactionMaternal mental healthMotherNeonatal Intensive CareParent

Identifiers

PMID37131260
PMCPMC10155384
OpenAlexW4367670146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.