Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131236›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2023

Research note reliability and validity of Japanese version of the trauma-informed care provider survey (TIC provider survey).

Mayumi Kataoka, Risa Kotake, Hiroki Asaoka, Yuki Miyamoto, Daisuke Nishi

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mayumi KataokaDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9611-2119
Risa KotakeDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7- 3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5308-4293
Hiroki AsaokaDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7- 3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6731-482X
Yuki MiyamotoDepartment of Psychiatric Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7- 3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2192-0469
Daisuke NishiDepartment of Mental Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0033, Japan. d-nishi@m.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9349-3294

Funding

Health Labor Sciences Research Grant 20GC1021 to DN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRobust instruments to evaluate the ability of trauma-informed care among healthcare workers need to be developed, as this would help the implementation of trauma-informed care to prevent re-traumatization of patients. This study aims to assess the reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Trauma-Informed Care (TIC) Provider Survey. A total of 794 healthcare workers were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire, including the TIC Provider Survey, and six measures that were considered to be correlated with it. We calculated the Cronbach's alpha coefficient to investigate the internal consistency of each category of the TIC Provider Survey (knowledge, opinions, self-rated competence, practices, and barriers). Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were used to investigate the correlation between each category of the TIC Provider Survey, and other measures of construct validity.

resultsCronbach's alpha coefficients of each category of the TIC Provider Survey were 0.40 (Knowledge), 0.63 (Opinions), 0.92 (Self-rated competence), 0.93 (Practices), and 0.87 (Barriers). The Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were small. We confirmed the reliability of the acceptable levels and examined the validity of modest or unacceptable levels of the Japanese version of the TIC provider survey among Japanese workers in a healthcare setting.

Indexed as

AttitudeSurveys and QuestionnairesDelivery of Health CareHumansJapanPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsReliabilityScaleTraumaTrauma-informed careValidity

Identifiers

PMID37131236
PMCPMC10152421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.