Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131231›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2023

Can a powered knee-ankle prosthesis improve weight-bearing symmetry during stand-to-sit transitions in individuals with above-knee amputations?

Grace R Hunt, Sarah Hood, Lukas Gabert, Tommaso Lenzi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06406491 (Application Observation of Passive Microprocessor-controlled Knees vs. Active Microprocessor-controlled Knees After Transfemoral Amputation), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06406491 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Application Observation of Passive Microprocessor-controlled Knees vs. Active Microprocessor-controlled Knees After Transfemoral Amputation

TypeobservationalSponsorMedianRan2024 to 2024Enrolled10ConditionsAmputationArmsactive microprocessor-controlled knee
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Design and evaluation of a bone-anchored, neurally-controlled knee prosthesis.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Improving Sit/Stand Loading Symmetry and Timing Through Unified Variable Impedance Control of a Powered Knee-Ankle Prosthesis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Grace R HuntDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. grace.hunt@hsc.utah.edu.
Sarah HoodDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Lukas GabertDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Tommaso LenziDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

Lightweight Powered Prosthesis for Above-knee AmputeesR01HD098154 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Tommaso Lenzi · 2019 to 2026
$3.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD098154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter above-knee amputation, the missing biological knee and ankle are replaced with passive prosthetic devices. Passive prostheses are able to dissipate limited amounts of energy using resistive damper systems during "negative energy" tasks like sit-down. However, passive prosthetic knees are not able to provide high levels of resistance at the end of the sit-down movement when the knee is flexed, and users need the most support. Consequently, users are forced to over-compensate with their upper body, residual hip, and intact leg, and/or sit down with a ballistic and uncontrolled movement. Powered prostheses have the potential to solve this problem. Powered prosthetic joints are controlled by motors, which can produce higher levels of resistance at a larger range of joint positions than passive damper systems. Therefore, powered prostheses have the potential to make sitting down more controlled and less difficult for above-knee amputees, improving their functional mobility.

methodsTen individuals with above-knee amputations sat down using their prescribed passive prosthesis and a research powered knee-ankle prosthesis. Subjects performed three sit-downs with each prosthesis while we recorded joint angles, forces, and muscle activity from the intact quadricep muscle. Our main outcome measures were weight-bearing symmetry and muscle effort of the intact quadricep muscle. We performed paired t-tests on these outcome measures to test for significant differences between passive and powered prostheses.

resultsWe found that the average weight-bearing symmetry improved by 42.1% when subjects sat down with the powered prosthesis compared to their passive prostheses. This difference was significant (p = 0.0012), and every subject's weight-bearing symmetry improved when using the powered prosthesis. Although the intact quadricep muscle contraction differed in shape, neither the integral nor the peak of the signal was significantly different between conditions (integral p > 0.01, peak p > 0.01).

conclusionsIn this study, we found that a powered knee-ankle prosthesis significantly improved weight-bearing symmetry during sit-down compared to passive prostheses. However, we did not observe a corresponding decrease in intact-limb muscle effort. These results indicate that powered prosthetic devices have the potential to improve balance during sit-down for individuals with above-knee amputation and provide insight for future development of powered prosthetics.

Indexed as

AmputeesArtificial LimbsKnee ProsthesisAmputation, SurgicalAnkleBiomechanical PhenomenaGaitHumansProsthesis DesignSitting PositionWalkingWeight-BearingAmputeeKnee-ankle prosthesisPowered prostheticsSit-downTransfemoralWearable robotics

Identifiers

PMID37131231
PMCPMC10155411
OpenAlexW4367693863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.