Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131207›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Assessing cultural safety in general practice consultations for Indigenous patients: protocol for a mixed methods sequential embedded design study.

Kay Brumpton, Raelene Ward, Rebecca Evans, Henry Neill, Hannah Woodall, Lawrie McArthur, Tarun Sen Gupta

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Implementation and Evaluation of Cultural Safety Initiatives in Australian Hospital Settings: A Scoping Review.Journal of transcultural nursing : official journal of the Transcultural Nursing Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kay BrumptonRural Medical Education Australia, Toowoomba, Australia. k.brumpton@ruralmeded.org.au.
Raelene WardUniversity of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia.
Rebecca EvansCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Henry NeillCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Hannah WoodallRural Medical Education Australia, Toowoomba, Australia.
Lawrie McArthurCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.
Tarun Sen GuptaCollege of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia.

Funding

Australian College of Rural and Remote Medicine Education Research GrantMedical Research Futures Fund 2020 Clinician Researchers: Applied Research in Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessment of cultural safety in general practice consultations for Indigenous patients is a complex notion. Design and development of any assessment tool needs to be cognizant that cultural safety is determined by Indigenous peoples and incorporates defined components of cultural safety and current educational theory. Consideration of how social, historical, and political determinants of health and well-being impact upon the cultural safety of a consultation is also important. Given this complexity, we assume that no single method of assessment will be adequate to determine if general practice (GP) registrars are demonstrating or delivering culturally safe care. As such, we propose that development and assessment of cultural safety can be conceptualised using a model that considers these variables. From this, we aim to develop a tool to assess whether GP registrars are conducting a culturally safe consultation, where cultural safety is determined by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

methodsThis protocol will be situated in a pragmatic philosophical position to explore cultural safety primarily from the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients' perspective with triangulation and validation of findings with the GP and GP registrar perspective, the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community, and the medical education community. The study will integrate both quantitative and qualitative data through three sequential phases. Data collection will be through survey, semi-structured interviews, an adapted nominal group technique, and a Delphi questionnaire. We aim to recruit approximately 40 patient and 20 GP participants for interviews, conduct one to five nominal groups (seven to 35 participants) and recruit fifteen participants for the Delphi process. Data will be analysed through a content analysis approach to identify components of an assessment of cultural safety for GP registrars. DISCUSSION: This study will be one of the first to explore how cultural safety, as determined by Indigenous peoples, can be assessed in general practice consultations. This protocol is shared to stimulate awareness and discussion around this significant issue and prompt other studies in this area.

Indexed as

General PracticeHealth Services, IndigenousAustraliaAustralian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesCultural CompetencyHumansReferral and ConsultationAssessmentCultural safetyGeneral practiceIndigenousRegistrars

Identifiers

PMID37131207
PMCPMC10152729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.