Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131157›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2023

Health professions students' approaches towards practice-driven ethical dilemmas; a case-based qualitative study.

Phyu Hnin Hlaing, Ahmed Hasswan, Vida Salmanpour, Sarra Shorbagi, Tahra AlMahmoud, Feras Jassim Jirjees, Sausan Al Kawas, Salman Yusuf Guraya, Nabil Sulaiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Phyu Hnin HlaingCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Ahmed HasswanCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Vida SalmanpourCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sarra ShorbagiCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Tahra AlMahmoudCollege of Medicine and Health Science, United Arab Emirates University, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Feras Jassim JirjeesCollege of Pharmacy, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Sausan Al KawasCollege of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Salman Yusuf GurayaCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Nabil SulaimanCollege of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. nsulaiman@sharjah.ac.ae.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn healthcare practice, ethical challenges are inevitable and their optimal handling may potentialy improve patient care. Ethical development in medical education is critical for the transition from a medical and health sciences student to an ethical healthcare practitioner. Understanding the health professions students' approaches towards practice-driven ethical dilemmas could harness i the effective ethical development in their medical education. This study attempts to identify the health professions students' approaches towards practice-driven ethical dilemmas.

methodsAn inductive qualitative evaluation was conducted on six recorded videos of health professions students' case-based online group discussions, followed by a one-hour online ethics workshop. The online ethics workshop was organized with students from the College of Medicine, College of Dental Medicine and College of Pharmacy at the University of Sharjah, and the College of Medicine at the United Arab Emirates University. . The recorded videos were transcribed verbatim and imported to the qualitative data analysis software of MAXQDA 2022. Data were analyzed applying four stages of review, reflect, reduce and retrieve and two different coders triangulated the findings.

resultsSix themes emerged from the qualitative analysis of the health professions students' approaches to the practice-based ethical dilemmas; (1) emotions, (2) personal experiences, (3) law and legal system, (4) professional background, (5) knowledge of medical research and (6) inter-professional education. In addition, during the case-based group discussions in the ethics workshop, students efficiently applied the relevant ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice in their reasoning process to reach an ethical decision.

conclusionThe findings of this study explained how health professions students resolve ethical dilemmas in their ethical reasoning process. This work sheds light on ethical development in medical education by gaining students' perspectives in dealing with complex clinical scenarios. The findings from this qualitative evaluation will aid academic medical institutions in developing medical and research-based ethics curriculum to transform students to ethical leaders.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalStudents, Health OccupationsStudents, MedicalHealth OccupationsHumansProblem SolvingQualitative ResearchEthical decisionEthical dilemmasHealth professions studentsInter-professional educationMedical ethics

Identifiers

PMID37131157
PMCPMC10152413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.