Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131131›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2023

CAGECAT: The CompArative GEne Cluster Analysis Toolbox for rapid search and visualisation of homologous gene clusters.

Matthias van den Belt, Cameron Gilchrist, Thomas J Booth, Yit-Heng Chooi, Marnix H Medema, Mohammad Alanjary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
31.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Members of theMicrobial genomics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Biosynthetic diversity and antifungal potential of soil-derivedApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. In Vivo Characterization of theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Matthias van den BeltBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Cameron GilchristSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Thomas J BoothSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Yit-Heng ChooiSchool of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Marnix H MedemaBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Mohammad AlanjaryBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. mohammad.alanjary@wur.nl.
Wageningen University & Research · NLThe University of Western Australia · AUSeoul National University · KR

Funding

European Research Council 948770-DECIPHER
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCo-localized sets of genes that encode specialized functions are common across microbial genomes and occur in genomes of larger eukaryotes as well. Important examples include Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) that produce specialized metabolites with medicinal, agricultural, and industrial value (e.g. antimicrobials). Comparative analysis of BGCs can aid in the discovery of novel metabolites by highlighting distribution and identifying variants in public genomes. Unfortunately, gene-cluster-level homology detection remains inaccessible, time-consuming and difficult to interpret.

resultsThe comparative gene cluster analysis toolbox (CAGECAT) is a rapid and user-friendly platform to mitigate difficulties in comparative analysis of whole gene clusters. The software provides homology searches and downstream analyses without the need for command-line or programming expertise. By leveraging remote BLAST databases, which always provide up-to-date results, CAGECAT can yield relevant matches that aid in the comparison, taxonomic distribution, or evolution of an unknown query. The service is extensible and interoperable and implements the cblaster and clinker pipelines to perform homology search, filtering, gene neighbourhood estimation, and dynamic visualisation of resulting variant BGCs. With the visualisation module, publication-quality figures can be customized directly from a web-browser, which greatly accelerates their interpretation via informative overlays to identify conserved genes in a BGC query.

conclusionOverall, CAGECAT is an extensible software that can be interfaced via a standard web-browser for whole region homology searches and comparison on continually updated genomes from NCBI. The public web server and installable docker image are open source and freely available without registration at: https://cagecat.bioinformatics.nl .

Indexed as

ComputersSoftwareCluster AnalysisGenomeMultigene FamilyBiosyntheticColocalizedComparative analysisGene clusterHomology searchSecondary metabolite

Identifiers

PMID37131131
PMCPMC10155394
OpenAlexW4367833791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.