Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131090›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2024

Barriers to Surrogate Application of Patient Values in Medical Decisions in Acute Stroke: Qualitative Study in a Biethnic Community.

Rebecca J Lank, Lewis B Morgenstern, Carmen Ortiz, Erin Case, Darin B Zahuranec

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca J LankStroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Lewis B MorgensternStroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Carmen OrtizStroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Erin CaseStroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Darin B ZahuranecStroke Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. zdarin@med.umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9772-2469
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

STROKE SURVEILLANCE IN A BIETHNIC COMMUNITYR01NS038916 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI LISABETH, LYNDA D, MORGENSTERN, LEWIS B · 1999 to 2023
$20.9M
Outcomes Among Surrogate decision makers In Stroke (OASIS)R01NS091112 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MORGENSTERN, LEWIS B, ZAHURANEC, DARIN B · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038916NINDS NIH HHS R01NS038916NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS091112NINDS NIH HHS R01NS091112
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe objective of this study was to identify barriers to surrogate decision-maker application of patient values on life-sustaining treatments after stroke in Mexican American (MA) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative analysis of semistructured interviews with stroke patient surrogate decision-makers completed approximately 6 months after hospitalization.

resultsForty-two family surrogate decision-makers participated (median age: 54.5 years; female: 83%; patients were MA [60%] and NHW [36%], and 50% were deceased at the time of the interview). We identified three primary barriers to surrogates' applications of patient values and preferences when making decisions on life-sustaining treatments: (1) a minority of surrogates had no prior discussion of what the patient would want in the event of a serious medical illness, (2) surrogates struggled to apply prior known values and preferences to the actual decisions made, and (3) surrogates felt guilt or burden, often even in the setting of some knowledge of patient values or preferences. The first two barriers were seen to a similar degree in MA and NHW participants, though guilt or burden was reported more commonly among MA (28%) than NHW (13%) participants. Maintaining patient independence (e.g., ability to live at home, avoid a nursing home, make their own decisions) was the most important priority for decision-making for both MA and NHW participants; however, MA participants were more likely to list spending time with family as an important priority (24% vs. 7%).

conclusionsStroke surrogate decision-makers may benefit from (1) continued efforts to make advance care planning more common and more relevant, (2) assistance in how to apply their knowledge of patient values to actual treatment decisions, and (3) psychosocial support to reduce emotional burden. Barriers to surrogate application of patient values were generally similar in MA and NHW participants, though the possibility of greater guilt or burden among MA surrogates warrants further investigation and confirmation.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningStrokeDecision MakingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedLife-sustaining treatmentsMexican AmericansStrokeSurrogate Decision makers

Identifiers

PMID37131090
PMCPMC10620105
OpenAlexW4367671582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.