Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131063›Full record

ArticleJournal of digital imaging2023

Automated Urine Cell Image Classification Model Using Chaotic Mixer Deep Feature Extraction.

Mehmet Erten, Ilknur Tuncer, Prabal D Barua, Kubra Yildirim, Sengul Dogan, Turker Tuncer, Ru-San Tan, Hamido Fujita, U Rajendra Acharya

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Mehmet ErtenDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Malatya Training and Research Hospital, Malatya, Türkiye.
Ilknur TuncerElazig Governorship, Interior Ministry, Elazig, Türkiye.
Prabal D BaruaCogninet Australia, Sydney, NSW, 2010, Australia.
Kubra YildirimDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Sengul DoganDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye. sdogan@firat.edu.tr.
Turker TuncerDepartment of Digital Forensics Engineering, Technology Faculty, Firat University, Elazig, Türkiye.
Ru-San TanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hamido FujitaFaculty of Information Technology, HUTECH University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
U Rajendra AcharyaSchool of Mathematics, Physics and Computing, University of Southern Queensland, Springfield, Australia.
Fırat University · TRElazığ Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRIwate Prefectural University · JPMalatya Devlet Hastanesi · TRNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGSRM Institute of Science and Technology · INUniversity of Southern Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic examination of urinary sediments is a common laboratory procedure. Automated image-based classification of urinary sediments can reduce analysis time and costs. Inspired by cryptographic mixing protocols and computer vision, we developed an image classification model that combines a novel Arnold Cat Map (ACM)- and fixed-size patch-based mixer algorithm with transfer learning for deep feature extraction. Our study dataset comprised 6,687 urinary sediment images belonging to seven classes: Cast, Crystal, Epithelia, Epithelial nuclei, Erythrocyte, Leukocyte, and Mycete. The developed model consists of four layers: (1) an ACM-based mixer to generate mixed images from resized 224 × 224 input images using fixed-size 16 × 16 patches; (2) DenseNet201 pre-trained on ImageNet1K to extract 1,920 features from each raw input image, and its six corresponding mixed images were concatenated to form a final feature vector of length 13,440; (3) iterative neighborhood component analysis to select the most discriminative feature vector of optimal length 342, determined using a k-nearest neighbor (kNN)-based loss function calculator; and (4) shallow kNN-based classification with ten-fold cross-validation. Our model achieved 98.52% overall accuracy for seven-class classification, outperforming published models for urinary cell and sediment analysis. We demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of deep feature engineering using an ACM-based mixer algorithm for image preprocessing combined with pre-trained DenseNet201 for feature extraction. The classification model was both demonstrably accurate and computationally lightweight, making it ready for implementation in real-world image-based urine sediment analysis applications.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopyBiomedical image classificationChaotic mixer deep feature extractionFeature engineeringImage classificationUrine analysisUrine cell classificationUrine sediment

Identifiers

PMID37131063
PMCPMC10407001
OpenAlexW4367681442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.