Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131030›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Potential pharmacological confounders in the setting of death determined by neurologic criteria: a narrative review.

Salmaan Kanji, David Williamson, Michael Hartwick

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Salmaan KanjiDepartment of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada. skanji@toh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0594-0360
David WilliamsonFaculté de pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Michael HartwickDepartment of Pharmacy, The Ottawa Hospital, 501 Smyth Rd, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L6, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital · CAHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guidelines for the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC) require an absence of confounding factors if clinical examination alone is to be used. Drugs that depress the central nervous system suppress neurologic responses and spontaneous breathing and must be excluded or reversed prior to proceeding. If these confounding factors cannot be eliminated, ancillary testing is required. These drugs may be present after being administered as part of the treatment of critically ill patients. While measurement of serum drug concentrations can help guide the timing of assessments for DNC, they are not always available or feasible. In this article, we review sedative and opioid drugs that may confound DNC, along with pharmacokinetic factors that govern the duration of drug action. Pharmacokinetic parameters including a context-sensitive half-life of sedatives and opioids are highly variable in critically ill patients because of the multitude of clinical variables and conditions that can affect drug distribution and clearance. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors that influence the distribution and clearance of these drugs are discussed including end organ function, age, obesity, hyperdynamic states, augmented renal clearance, fluid balance, hypothermia, and the role of prolonged drug infusions in critically ill patients. In these contexts, it is often difficult to predict how long after drug discontinuation the confounding effects will take to dissipate. We propose a conservative framework for evaluating when or if DNC can be determined by clinical criteria alone. When pharmacologic confounders cannot be reversed, or doing so is not feasible, ancillary testing to confirm the absence of brain blood flow should be obtained.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHypnotics and SedativesAnalgesics, OpioidBrain DeathHumansAnalgesics, OpioidHypnotics and Sedativesdeath determination by neurologic criteriadrug confoundersopioidspharmacokinetics sedatives

Identifiers

PMID37131030
PMCPMC10202973
OpenAlexW4367693334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.