Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37131021›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2023

Rationale for revisions to the definition of death and criteria for its determination in Canada.

Nicholas B Murphy, Michael Hartwick, Lindsay C Wilson, Christy Simpson, Sam D Shemie, Sylvia Torrance, Jennifer A Chandler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. In reply: Brain death is more than technical.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas B MurphyDepartment of Medicine, Western University, 1151 Richmond St., London, ON, N6A 3K7, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0137-9238
Michael HartwickDivisions of Critical Care and Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Lindsay C WilsonCanadian Blood Services, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Christy SimpsonDepartment of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Sam D ShemieDivision of Critical Care Medicine, Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Sylvia TorranceConsultant, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jennifer A ChandlerFaculty of Law, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clarity regarding the biomedical definition of death and the criteria for its determination is critical to inform practices in clinical care, medical research, law, and organ donation. While best practices for death determination by neurologic criteria and circulatory criteria were previously outlined in Canadian medical guidelines, several issues have arisen to force their reappraisal. Ongoing scientific discovery, corresponding changes in medical practice, and legal and ethical challenges compel a comprehensive update. Accordingly, the A Brain-Based Definition of Death and Criteria for its Determination After Arrest of Neurologic or Circulatory Function in Canada project was undertaken to a develop a unified brain-based definition of death, and to establish criteria for its determination after devastating brain injury and/or circulatory arrest. Specifically, the project had three objectives: (1) to clarify that death is defined in terms of brain functions; (2) to clarify how a brain-based definition of death is articulated; and (3) to clarify the criteria for determining if the brain-based definition is met. The updated death determination guideline therefore defines death as the permanent cessation of brain function and describes corresponding circulatory and neurologic criteria to ascertain the permanent cessation of brain function. This article explores the challenges that prompted revisions to the biomedical definition of death and the criteria for its determination and outlines the rationales underpinning the project's three objectives. By clarifying that all death is defined in terms of brain function, the project seeks to align guidelines with contemporary medicolegal understandings of the biological basis of death.

Indexed as

Heart ArrestTissue and Organ ProcurementBrainBrain DeathCanadaDeathHumansbrain deathdetermination of deathethicsmedicalpublic policy

Identifiers

PMID37131021
PMCPMC10203013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.