SynthesisNeurosurgical review2023
Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery-a systematic review.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acceptance and use of extended reality in surgical training: an umbrella review.Systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Virtual reality based quantitative evaluation of the effect of orbitotomy on frontal lobe retraction during tuberculum sellae meningioma surgery.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Pitfalls in Intracranial Aneurysm Clipping: How to Avoid and How to Get out of Them.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Towards Realistic 3D-Printed Phantoms for Aneurysm Clipping: Mechanical Characterisation of Basilar Arteries.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development and external validation of a mixed-reality aneurysm clipping simulator.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Smartwatch-based wrist tremor assessment in neurosurgical simulator training.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Reshaping neurosurgical training: a novel simulation-based concept for structured skill acquisition and curriculum integration.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Simulators with Haptic Feedback in Neurosurgery: Are We Reaching the "Aviator" Type of Training? Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Intraoperative visualization of cerebral aneurysms using navigated 3D-ultrasound power-Doppler angiography.Acta neurochirurgica · 2024Article
- Comment on - "Simulation training approaches in intracranial aneurysm surgery-a systematic review".Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Validation of a dynamic 4D microsurgical bypass simulator for training and teaching microvascular anastomosis techniques with blood flow and fluorescence imaging.World neurosurgery: X · 2024Article
- How AI and Robotics Will Advance Interventional Radiology: Narrative Review and Future Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Dynamic Mixed-Reality Patient-Specific Aneurysm Clipping Simulation for Two Cases-A Feasibility Study.Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2023Article
- Enhancing microsurgical skills in neurosurgery residents of low-income countries: A comprehensive guide.Surgical neurology international · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the increasing complexity and decreasing exposure to intracranial aneurysm surgery, training and maintenance of the surgical skills have become challenging. This review elaborated on simulation training for intracranial aneurysm clipping.
methodsA systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies on aneurysm clipping training using models and simulators. The primary outcome was the identification of the predominant modes of the simulation process, models, and training methods associated with a microsurgical learning curve. The secondary outcomes included assessments of the validation of such simulators and the learning capability from the use of such simulators.
resultsOf the 2068 articles screened, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The chosen reports used a wide range of simulation approaches including ex vivo methods (n = 6); virtual reality (VR) platforms (n = 11); and static (n = 6) and dynamic (n = 3) 3D-printed aneurysm models (n = 6). The ex vivo training methods have limited availability, VR simulators lack haptics and tactility, while 3D static models lack important microanatomical components and the simulation of blood flow. 3D dynamic models including pulsatile flow are reusable and cost-effective but miss microanatomical components.
conclusionsThe existing training methods are heterogenous and do not realistically simulate the complete microsurgical workflow. The current simulations lack certain anatomical features and crucial surgical steps. Future research should focus on developing and validating a reusable, cost-effective training platform. No systematic validation method exists for the different training models, so there is a need to build homogenous assessment tools and validate the role of simulation in education and patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.