Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37130709›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie

Early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal surgery: a nonrandomized prospective feasibility trial.

Line Rokkedal Jønsson, Nicolai Bang Foss, Janne Orbæk, Morten Laksafoss Lauritsen, Helene Nygaard Sejrsen, Morten Tange Kristensen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Line Rokkedal JønssonFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen) linerokkedal@hotmail.com.
Nicolai Bang FossFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen).
Janne OrbækFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen).
Morten Laksafoss LauritsenFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen).
Helene Nygaard SejrsenFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen).
Morten Tange KristensenFrom the Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Research - Copenhagen (PMR-C), Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Rokkedal Jønsson, Nygaard Sejrsen); the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Bang Foss); the Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark (Bang Foss, Tange Kristensen); the Gastro Unit Surgical Division, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark (Orbæk, Laksafoss Lauritsen); the Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg-Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark (Tange Kristensen).
University of Copenhagen · DKAmager Hospital · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DKHvidovre Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobilization after emergency abdominal surgery is considered essential to facilitate rehabilitation and reduce postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of early intensive mobilization after acute high-risk abdominal (AHA) surgery.

methodsWe conducted a nonrandomized, prospective feasibility trial of consecutive patients after AHA surgery at a university hospital in Denmark. The participants followed a predefined, interdisciplinary protocol for early intensive mobilization during the first 7 postoperative days (PODs) of their hospital admission. We evaluated feasibility in accordance with the percentage of patients who mobilized within 24 hours after surgery, mobilized at least 4 times per day and achieved daily goals of time out of bed and walking distance.

resultsWe included 48 patients with a mean age of 61 (standard deviation 17) years (48% female). Within 24 hours after surgery, 92% of the patients were mobilized and 82% or more were mobilized at least 4 times per day over the first 7 PODs. On PODs 1-3, 70%-89% of the participants achieved the daily goals of mobilization; participants still in hospital after POD 3 were less able to achieve the daily goals. Patient reported that the primary factors limiting their level of mobilization were fatigue, pain and dizziness. Participants not mobilized independently on POD 3 (28%) had significantly (

conclusionThe early intensive mobilization protocol seems feasible for most patients after AHA surgery. For nonindependent patients, however, alternative mobilization strategies and goals should be investigated.

Indexed as

AbdomenPostoperative ComplicationsEarly AmbulationFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37130709
PMCPMC10158751
OpenAlexW4367834556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.