Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37130668›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

A culturally tailored personaliseD nutrition intErvention in South ASIan women at risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (DESI-GDM): a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Rosain N Stennett, Kristi B Adamo, Sonia S Anand, Harpreet S Bajaj, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Dipika Desai, Hertzel C Gerstein, Sujane Kandasamy, Farah Khan, Scott A Lear and 11 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03607799 (A Culturally-tailored Personalized Nutrition Intervention in South Asian Women at Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03607799 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

A Culturally-tailored Personalized Nutrition Intervention in South Asian Women at Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2020 to 2025Enrolled140ConditionsDiabetes, GestationalArmsDietary Intervention, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Rosain N StennettDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3386-2558
Kristi B AdamoSchool of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Sonia S AnandDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3692-7441
Harpreet S BajajLMC Healthcare, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shrikant I BangdiwalaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3111-0689
Dipika DesaiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hertzel C GersteinDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8072-2836
Sujane KandasamyDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4326-2783
Farah KhanPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Scott A LearPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7614-755X
Sarah D McDonaldDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Tayler PocsaiPopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Paul RitvoKinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1141-0083
Andrea RoggePopulation Health Research Institute, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Karleen M SchulzeDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7481-5697
Diana SherifaliDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4423-3848
Jennifer C StearnsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gita WahiDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Natalie C WilliamsDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michael A ZulyniakFood Science and Nutrition, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4944-5521
Russell J de SouzaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada desouzrj@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-8945-513X
Population Health Research Institute · CAImpact · CACARE Canada · CAMcMaster University · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Ottawa · CAYork University · CA

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSouth Asians are more likely to develop gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) than white Europeans. Diet and lifestyle modifications may prevent GDM and reduce undesirable outcomes in both the mother and offspring. Our study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness and participant acceptability of a culturally tailored, personalised nutrition intervention on the glucose area under the curve (AUC) after a 2-hour 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in pregnant women of South Asian ancestry with GDM risk factors. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A total of 190 South Asian pregnant women with at least 2 of the following GDM risk factors-prepregnancy body mass index>23, age>29, poor-quality diet, family history of type 2 diabetes in a first-degree relative or GDM in a previous pregnancy will be enrolled during gestational weeks 12-18, and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to: (1) usual care, plus weekly text messages to encourage walking and paper handouts or (2) a personalised nutrition plan developed and delivered by a culturally congruent dietitian and health coach; and FitBit to track steps. The intervention lasts 6-16 weeks, depending on week of recruitment. The primary outcome is the glucose AUC from a three-sample 75 g OGTT 24-28 weeks' gestation. The secondary outcome is GDM diagnosis, based on Born-in-Bradford criteria (fasting glucose>5.2 mmol/L or 2 hours post load>7.2 mmol/L). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB #10942). Findings will be disseminated among academics and policy-makers through scientific publications along with community-orientated strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03607799.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultBlood GlucoseFemaleGlucoseGlucose Tolerance TestHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsBlood GlucoseGlucoseDiabetes in pregnancyNUTRITION & DIETETICSPUBLIC HEALTH

Identifiers

PMID37130668
PMCPMC10163497
OpenAlexW4367692529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.