Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37130106›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

In situ assessment of Mindin as a biomarker of podocyte lesions in diabetic nephropathy.

Ana Luisa Monteiro Dos Santos Martins, Alexia Borges Bernardes, Verônica Aparecida Ferreira, David Campos Wanderley, Stanley de Almeida Araújo, José Rodrigues do Carmo Neto, Crislaine Aparecida da Silva, Régia Caroline Peixoto Lira, Liliane Silvano Araújo, Marlene Antônia Dos Reis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Influence of Podocyte Injury on the Development of Class IV Lupus Nephritis.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ana Luisa Monteiro Dos Santos MartinsDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alexia Borges BernardesDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-5667
Verônica Aparecida FerreiraDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
David Campos WanderleyInstitute of Nephropathology, Center for Electron Microscopy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Stanley de Almeida AraújoInstitute of Nephropathology, Center for Electron Microscopy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
José Rodrigues do Carmo NetoDepartment of Bioscience and Technology, Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health, Federal University of Goiás, Goiania, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5748-5112
Crislaine Aparecida da SilvaDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Régia Caroline Peixoto LiraDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Liliane Silvano AraújoDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marlene Antônia Dos ReisDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Juliana Reis MachadoDepartment of Pathology, Genetics and Evolution, Discipline of General Pathology, Institute of Biological and Natural Sciences of Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8673-7788
Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal failure worldwide. Several mechanisms are involved in the pathogenesis of this disease, which culminate in morphological changes such as podocyte injury. Despite the complex diagnosis and pathogenesis, limited attempts have been made to establish new biomarkers for DN. The higher concentration of Mindin protein in the urine of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus suggests that it plays a role in DN. Therefore, this study investigated whether in situ protein expression of Mindin can be considered a potential DN biomarker. Fifty renal biopsies from patients diagnosed with DN, 57 with nondiabetic glomerular diseases, including 17 with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), 14 with minimal lesion disease (MLD) and 27 with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN), and 23 adult kidney samples from autopsies (control group) were evaluated for Mindin expression by immunohistochemistry. Podocyte density was inferred by Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1) immunostaining, while foot process effacement was assessed by transmission electron microscopy. Receiver operative characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the biomarker sensitivity/specificity. Low podocyte density and increased Mindin expression were observed in all cases of DN, regardless of their class. In the DN group, Mindin expression was significantly higher than that in the FSGS, MCD, IgAN and control groups. Higher Mindin expression was significantly positively correlated with foot process effacement only in class III DN cases. Furthermore, Mindin protein presented high specificity in the biopsies of patients with DN (p < 0.0001). Our data suggest that Mindin may play a role in DN pathogenesis and is a promising biomarker of podocyte lesions.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic NephropathiesGlomerulonephritis, IGAGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalPodocytesAdultBiomarkersExtracellular Matrix ProteinsHumansBiomarkersExtracellular Matrix Proteinsmindin

Identifiers

PMID37130106
PMCPMC10153717
OpenAlexW4367668499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.