ArticlePloS one2023
Isolation of salivary cell-free DNA for cancer detection.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utility and clinical effectiveness of liquid biopsy-based DNA methylation testing in early tumor screening and diagnosis, emphasizing older adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Persistent Oral High-Risk HPV Detection: A Narrative Review of Longitudinal Assessment, Diagnostic Evaluation, and Surveillance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Detection of mutated KRAS, TP53, CDKN2A, and SMAD4 in tumor cell-free DNA of Brazilian pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients using next-generation sequencing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Ex vivo HNSCC clinical studies using saliva and antiviral or antibacterial chewing gums reveal reduction in carcinogenic microbes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Circulating extracellular vesicle PTPRO methylation: an exploratory biomarker for minimally invasive diagnosis of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2026Article
- Salivary cell-free DNA in head and neck cancer: emerging clinical applications and future perspectives.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Research progress on carcinogenic factors and personalized treatment of oral cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Salivary genetic biomarkers of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- Cell-Free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Oral Carcinogenesis and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Translational Perspective.Cancers · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial D-loop variants and copy number alterations in saliva of basaloid squamous cell carcinoma patient: Can it be worth as a prognostic value? Case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2025Article
- Leveraging Saliva for Insights into Head and Neck Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cell-free nucleic acid fragmentomics: A non-invasive window into cellular epigenomes.Translational oncology · 2024Review
- Single-stranded pre-methylated 5mC adapters uncover the methylation profile of plasma ultrashort Single-stranded cell-free DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Detection of hepatocellular carcinoma methylation markers in salivary DNA.Bioscience reports · 2024Article
- Pre-Analytical Factors Affecting Extracellular DNA in Saliva.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Saliva is an emerging source of disease biomarkers, particularly for cancers of the head and neck. Although analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in saliva holds promise as a liquid biopsy for cancer detection, currently there are no standardized methodologies for the collection and isolation of saliva for the purposes of studying DNA. Here, we evaluated various saliva collection receptacles and DNA purification techniques, comparing DNA quantity, fragment size, source, and stability. Then, using our optimized techniques, we tested the ability to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA- a bona fide cancer biomarker in a subset of head and neck cancers- from patient saliva samples. For saliva collection, we found that the Oragene OG-600 receptacle yielded the highest concentration of total salivary DNA as well as short fragments <300 bp corresponding to mononucleosomal cell-free DNA. Moreover, these short fragments were stabilized beyond 48 hours after collection in contrast to other saliva collection receptacles. For DNA purification from saliva, the QIAamp Circulating Nucleic Acid kit yielded the highest concentration of mononucleosome-sized DNA fragments. Freeze-thaw of saliva samples did not affect DNA yield or fragment size distribution. Salivary DNA isolated from the OG-600 receptacle was found to be composed of both single and double-stranded DNA, including mitochondrial and microbial sources. While levels of nuclear DNA were consistent over time, levels of mitochondrial and microbial DNA were more variable and increased 48 hours after collection. Finally, we found that HPV DNA was stable in OG-600 receptacles, was reliably detected within the saliva of patients with HPV-positive head and neck cancer, and was abundant among mononucleosome-sized cell-free DNA fragments. Our studies have defined optimal techniques for isolating DNA from saliva that will contribute to future applications in liquid biopsy-based cancer detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.