ArticleJournal of analytical toxicology2023
Intralipid as a matrix additive for evaluating hyperlipidemic postmortem blood.
Article in Journal of analytical toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postmortem whole blood samples can differ greatly in quality where hyperlipemia is a frequent variable that can influence the results of analytical methods. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of lipemia on postmortem analysis as well as demonstrate the usage of Intralipid in comparison to pooled postmortem lipids as matrix additives for meaningful evaluation and validation of hyperlipidemic postmortem samples. Hyperlipidemic blood samples were simulated by adding different concentrations of Intralipid or pooled authentic postmortem lipids to bovine whole blood. The hyperlipidemic blood samples were spiked with 14 benzodiazepines and five sedative and antianxiety drugs (alprazolam, clonazepam, 7-aminoclonazepam, diazepam, flunitrazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, hydroxyzine, lorazepam, midazolam, nitrazepam, 7-aminonitrazepam, nordazepam, oxazepam, propiomazine, dihydropropiomazine, temazepam, triazolam, zolpidem and zopiclone). Samples were prepared with liquid-liquid extraction followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The effects of lipemia on the recovery of analytes and internal standards (ISs) were evaluated to determine the effect of, and any differences between, the two additives. Lipemia was found to cause major interference when quantifying the analytes. For most analytes, the ISs could compensate for analyte losses. However, the most hydrophilic analytes (7-amino metabolites), together with the most lipophilic analytes (propiomazine and dihydropropiomazine), were greatly affected by lipemia (<50% recovery), and the IS could not compensate for analyte losses. In general, lower analyte recoveries were observed for samples with Intralipid as a lipemic additive in comparison to those containing pooled postmortem lipids. Both Intralipid and pooled postmortem lipids showed marked effects on the analytical results. Intralipid gave a good indication of the effects of lipemia and could be a useful tool for making a meaningful evaluation of hyperlipidemic postmortem samples during the method development and validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.