Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129952›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Participant Preferences for the Development of a Digitally Delivered Gardening Intervention to Improve Diet, Physical Activity, and Cardiovascular Health: Cross-sectional Study.

Susan Veldheer, Maxfield Whitehead-Zimmers, Candace Bordner, Benjamin Watt, David E Conroy, Kathryn H Schmitz, Christopher Sciamanna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan VeldheerDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6592-9249
Maxfield Whitehead-ZimmersDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1530-1940
Candace BordnerDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1087-2916
Benjamin WattPenn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5250-5938
David E ConroyDepartment of Kinesiology, Penn State University, State College, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0204-4093
Kathryn H SchmitzSchool of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2400-2935
Christopher SciamannaDepartment of Medicine, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-341X
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USPennsylvania State University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
Penn State Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR002015 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI VAN SCOY, LAUREN JODI · 2016 to 2025
$7.8M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002015NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow dietary intake of fruits and vegetables and physical inactivity are 2 modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Fruit and vegetable gardening can provide access to fresh produce, and many gardening activities are considered moderate physical activity. This makes gardening interventions a potential strategy for cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Previously developed gardening interventions have relied on in-person delivery models, which limit scalability and reach.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to ascertain participant insight on intervention components and topics of interest to inform a digitally delivered, gardening-focused, multiple health behavior change intervention.

methodsA web-based survey was delivered via Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk), including quantitative and open-ended questions. Eligible participants were aged ≥20 years, could read and write in English, were US residents, and had at least a 98% MTurk task approval rating. A multilevel screening process was used to identify and exclude respondents with response inattention, poor language fluency, or suspected automated web robots (bots). Participants were asked about their interest in gardening programming, their preferences for intervention delivery modalities (1-hour expert lectures, a series of brief <5-minute videos, or in-person meetings), and what information is needed to teach new gardeners. Comparisons were made between never gardeners (NG) and ever gardeners (EG) in order to examine differences in perceptions based on prior experience. Quantitative data were summarized, and differences between groups were tested using chi-square tests. Qualitative data were coded and organized into intervention functions based on the Behavior Change Wheel.

resultsA total of 465 participants were included (n=212, 45.6% NG and n=253, 54.4% EG). There was a high level of program interest overall (n=355, 76.3%), though interest was higher in EG (142/212, 67% NG; 213/253, 84.2% EG; P<.001). The majority of participants (n=282, 60.7%) preferred a series of brief <5-minute videos (136/212, 64.2% NG; 146/253, 57.7% EG; P=.16) over 1-hour lectures (29/212, 13.7% NG; 50/253, 19.8% EG; P=.08) or in-person delivery modes (47/212, 22.2% NG; 57/253, 22.5% EG; P=.93). Intervention functions identified were education and training (performing fundamental gardening and cooking activities), environmental restructuring (eg, social support), enablement (provision of tools or seeds), persuasion (offering encouragement and highlighting the benefits of gardening), and modeling (using content experts and participant testimonials). Content areas identified included the full lifecycle of gardening activities, from the fundamentals of preparing a garden site, planting and maintenance to harvesting and cooking.

conclusionsIn a sample of potential web-based learners, participants were interested in a digitally delivered gardening program. They preferred brief videos for content delivery and suggested content topics that encompassed how to garden from planting to harvesting and cooking. The next step in this line of work is to identify target behavior change techniques and pilot test the intervention to assess participant acceptability and preliminary efficacy.

Indexed as

behavior change wheelcardiovascular healthdietgardeningintervention developmentphysical activity

Identifiers

PMID37129952
PMCPMC10189628
OpenAlexW4353004166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.