ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2023
Novel Estrogen Receptor-Targeted Agents for Breast Cancer.
Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Germacrone: A Multi-targeting Sesquiterpene with Promising Anti-cancer and Chronic Disease Applications.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024Pooled it
- Targeting Estrogen Receptor for Breast Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- The natural L370F ERα variant confers endocrine resistance and sensitivity to ATRA in metastatic breast cancer cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Increased Antiproliferative Activity of Antiestrogens and Neratinib Treatment by Calcitriol in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- PROteolysis TArgeting Chimera (PROTAC) Estrogen Receptor Degraders for Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer.Targeted oncology · 2025Review
- Extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in early breast cancer: finding the individual balance.ESMO open · 2025Review
- Oral selective estrogen receptor degraders for breast cancer treatment: focus on pharmacological differences.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Review
- Assessing the causal relationship between plasma proteins and osteoporosis: novel insights into pathological mechanisms and therapeutic implications.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024Article
- Updates in Systemic Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early-Stage Breast Cancer.Current treatment options in oncology · 2024Review
- Current Status and Future Perspectives of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2024Review
- Therapeutic evolution in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: from targeted therapy to endocrine therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Targeted Degradation of CDK4/6: An Innovative Approach to Overcoming Cancer Drug Resistance.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2023Article
- Potential value of ctDNA monitoring in metastatic HR + /HER2 - breast cancer: longitudinal ctDNA analysis in the phase Ib MONALEESASIA trial.BMC medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementIt has become clear that patients whose cancers have progressed post-CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy (CDK4/6i) are not deriving the same magnitude of benefit to subsequent standard endocrine therapy as historical studies would suggest. For example, anticipated duration of benefit to fulvestrant prior to CDK4/6i historically was ~ 5-6 months, and data from the VERONICA and EMERALD trials report less than 2 months. This has magnified our need for novel endocrine agents. Some have argued that patients post-CDK4/6i may just have more endocrine-resistant tumors and perhaps should just receive chemotherapy. While this may be appropriate for some, we do not currently have an assay that reliably predicts whose cancers remain endocrine sensitive and whose are endocrine resistant. ESR1 mutations can enrich for patients whose tumors are more likely to be heavily dependent on estrogen, but this is certainly not the whole answer and many patients without ESR1 mutations continue to derive benefit from subsequent endocrine agents. Most patients would strongly prefer the side effect profile of endocrine agents compared to chemotherapy, and thus, premature use of cytotoxic agents when subsequent ER targeting can control disease is not preferred. These novel ER targeting agents (PROTAC, SERD, SERCA, CERAN) hold great promise to not only outperform standard agents like fulvestrant, but also offer the promise of agents with a different side effect profile that may be more advantageous when compared to menopausal symptoms, hot flashes, arthralgias, and sexual side effects so commonly seen with AIs. We also are likely to see these novel agents move to earlier lines, whether that be 1st line in combination with CDK4/6i or even adjuvant disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37129836What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.