Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129778›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection2023

The role of the calcofluor white staining in the diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis.

Carolin Elhardt, Romina Schweikert, Lennart Maximilian Hartmann, Efstathios Vounotrypidis, Adnan Kilani, Armin Wolf, Christian Maximilian Wertheimer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. New Frontiers inBiology · 2023
    Review
  5. Diagnosis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Carolin ElhardtDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany. Carolin.Elhardt@uniklinik-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-2985
Romina SchweikertDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3082-7028
Lennart Maximilian HartmannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.
Efstathios VounotrypidisDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9833-2200
Adnan KilaniDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4134-091X
Armin WolfDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6991-2214
Christian Maximilian WertheimerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, 89075, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7017-7560
University Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAcanthamoeba keratitis is often misdiagnosed at disease onset. This study presents data to confirm the diagnosis using calcofluor white (CFW) staining.

methodsForty three patients were retrospectively included who presented to the Department of Ophthalmology at the University Hospital Ulm with keratitis between 2000 and 2022. Condition positive cases were diagnosed based on the typical clinical presentation of Acanthamoeba keratitis with a positive polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Condition negative were patients with ulcers due to other causing pathogens with a negative Acanthamoeba PCR result. The condition was compared with the CFW test results.

resultsAfter symptom onset, time until presentation was 17 ± 12 days and until diagnosis 27 ± 13 days in the 15 condition positive patients. Among the 35 patients with additional CFW test, 7 patients were condition positive and 28 negative. 5 of the 7 patients were true positive, 2 were false negative. In the 28 condition negative patients, 1 was false positive. Sensitivity of CFW was 71% and specificity 96%. The positive PCR results were available 3.4 ± 2.3 days after corneal scraping, the positive CFW test results on the same day in each case.

conclusionOur data demonstrate that diagnosis of Acanthamoeba keratitis remains difficult and therapy is initiated late. A positive CFW test confirms the diagnosis as there are almost no false positive results and it was available faster than PCR. In case of a negative CFW test, Acanthamoeba keratitis cannot be ruled out because of a high false negative rate.

Indexed as

Acanthamoeba keratitisCalcofluor whiteMicrobiological testingPolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID37129778
PMCPMC10154449
OpenAlexW4367668729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.