Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129654›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2023

Prednisone vs Placebo and Live Birth in Patients With Recurrent Implantation Failure Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yun Sun, Linlin Cui, Yao Lu, Jichun Tan, Xi Dong, Tianxiang Ni, Junhao Yan, Yichun Guan, Guimin Hao, Jia-Yin Liu and 20 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Immunosuppressants in women with repeated implantation failure in assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Considerations of Fertility in Elite Sportswomen: A Narrative Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Endometrial immune dysregulation shapes CD8Frontiers in immunology · 2026
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Yun SunCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Linlin CuiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yao LuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jichun TanCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xi DongReproductive Medicine Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Tianxiang NiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Junhao YanCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yichun GuanReproductive Medicine Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Guimin HaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jia-Yin LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Bo ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi, China.
Daimin WeiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yan HongCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yaqiong HeCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Jia QiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Bing XuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Juanjuan LuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qian ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shanshan ZhaoCenter of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Xiaowei JiReproductive Medicine Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaofang DuReproductive Medicine Center, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Jie ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jinyong LiuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University/Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, China.
Yingqin HuangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi, China.
Dongmei HuangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Maternal and Child Health Hospital/Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guangxi, China.
Yanzhi DuCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Hugo VankelecomLaboratory of Tissue Plasticity in Health and Disease, Cluster of Stem Cell and Developmental Biology, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Heping ZhangDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.
Zi-Jiang ChenCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Renji Hospital · CNShandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNGuangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CNChina Medical University · CNSecond Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNShandong University · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CNThird Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNFudan University · CNKU Leuven · BEYale University · USZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Implantation failure remains a critical barrier to in vitro fertilization. Prednisone, as an immune-regulatory agent, is widely used to improve the probability of implantation and pregnancy, although the evidence for efficacy is inadequate. Objective: To determine the efficacy of 10 mg of prednisone compared with placebo on live birth among women with recurrent implantation failure. Design, Setting, and Participants: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted at 8 fertility centers in China. Eligible women who had a history of 2 or more unsuccessful embryo transfer cycles, were younger than 38 years when oocytes were retrieved, and were planning to undergo frozen-thawed embryo transfer with the availability of good-quality embryos were enrolled from November 2018 to August 2020 (final follow-up August 2021). Interventions: Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive oral pills containing either 10 mg of prednisone (n = 357) or matching placebo (n = 358) once daily, from the day at which they started endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer through early pregnancy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was live birth, defined as the delivery of any number of neonates born at 28 or more weeks' gestation with signs of life. Results: Among 715 women randomized (mean age, 32 years), 714 (99.9%) had data available on live birth outcomes and were included in the primary analysis. Live birth occurred among 37.8% of women (135 of 357) in the prednisone group vs 38.8% of women (139 of 358) in the placebo group (absolute difference, -1.0% [95% CI, -8.1% to 6.1%]; relative ratio [RR], 0.97 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.17]; P = .78). The rates of biochemical pregnancy loss were 17.3% in the prednisone group and 9.9% in the placebo group (absolute difference, 7.5% [95% CI, 0.6% to 14.3%]; RR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.03 to 2.99]; P = .04). Of those in the prednisone group, preterm delivery occurred among 11.8% and of those in the placebo group, 5.5% of pregnancies (absolute difference, 6.3% [95% CI, 0.2% to 12.4%]; RR, 2.14 [95% CI, 1.00 to 4.58]; P = .04). There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, implantation, neonatal complications, congenital anomalies, other adverse events, or mean birthweights. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with recurrent implantation failure, treatment with prednisone did not improve live birth rate compared with placebo. Data suggested that the use of prednisone may increase the risk of preterm delivery and biochemical pregnancy loss. Our results challenge the value of prednisone use in clinical practice for the treatment of recurrent implantation failure. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1800018783.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualFertilization in VitroLive BirthPrednisonePremature BirthAbortion, SpontaneousAdministration, OralAdultDouble-Blind MethodEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferFemaleHumansPlacebosPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePlacebosPrednisone

Identifiers

PMID37129654
PMCPMC10155063
OpenAlexW4367668756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.