Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129608›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Correlations between gustatory, trigeminal, and olfactory functions and nasal airflow.

Anna Kristina Hernandez, Antje Walke, Antje Haehner, Mandy Cuevas, Thomas Hummel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Impact of Septoplasty on Cognitive Function.Medeniyet medical journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna Kristina HernandezDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Haus 5, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. akmhernandezmd@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-7359
Antje WalkeDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Haus 5, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Antje HaehnerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Haus 5, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Mandy CuevasDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Haus 5, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas HummelDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Smell and Taste Clinic, TU Dresden, Haus 5, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEAsian Hospital and Medical Center · PH

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG HU 441/21-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft project number 468981129Volkswagen Foundation Az 9B396Volkswagen Foundation project PERCEPTRONICS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the relationship of chemosensory screening and nasal airflow tests among the same set of participants, and to determine other factors that are related to the outcomes of these tests.

methodsParticipants had no chemosensory complaints. Structured medical history was taken. Participants underwent 5 screening tests: q-sticks (orthonasal olfaction), q-powders (retronasal olfaction), trigeminal lateralization test, taste sprays, and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Ratings of smell/taste ability and nasal airflow were obtained using visual analogue scales (VAS). Composite sinusitis symptoms and significance of olfaction questionnaire scores were also determined.

resultsFour hundred participants were included in the study, 156 men, 244 women; aged 18-82 years (mean: 46). The q-powders and taste spray scores were weakly positively correlated with all the other chemosensory tests and PNIF. However, chemosensory test scores were not correlated with VAS, composite sinusitis symptoms, and significance of olfaction questionnaire scores. Various tests showed significant decrease starting at specific ages (in years, PNIF and trigeminal lateralization: 40, q-powders: 60, and q-sticks: 70).

conclusionChemosensory screening tests and self-rated chemosensory function showed no correlation in participants without chemosensory complaints. In addition, gustatory function appeared to be correlated with olfactory and trigeminal function but also with nasal airflow, and nasal airflow was related not only to olfactory but also to trigeminal and taste function. Over all, the results suggest that chemosensory functions (orthonasal olfactory, trigeminal, retronasal olfactory, gustatory) and nasal airflow are correlated with each other, which we propose may be possibly mediated, at least in part, through central nervous system interactions.

Indexed as

Olfaction DisordersSinusitisFemaleHumansMaleNosePowdersSmellPowdersChemosensory testsNasal airflowOlfactorySmellTasteTrigeminal

Identifiers

PMID37129608
PMCPMC10153028
OpenAlexW4367668959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.