ArticleRadiology2023
Prospective Evaluation of PI-RADS Version 2.1 for Prostate Cancer Detection and Investigation of Multiparametric MRI-derived Markers.
Article in Radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Detection rates for prostate cancer using PI-RADS 2.1 upgrading rules in transition zone lesions align with risk assessment categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2025Pooled it
- AI-Assisted Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Using Biparametric MRI and PI-RADS v2.1: Performance Comparison Between Novice-Level and Experienced Readers.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2026Article
- Apparent diffusion coefficient-based single-sequence radiomics integrated with clinical variables and Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Evaluation of MRI-based risk models versus PI-RADS version 2.1 and arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging strategy for clinically significant prostate cancer.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using targeted MRI-informed microultrasound biopsy.European radiology · 2026Article
- Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2.1 as a predictor of clinically significant and aggressive prostate cancer: a radical prostatectomy-validated study.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Decreased Tissue Sodium Concentration in Suspected Prostate Cancer Detected by Internal-ReferenceDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Glandular Density and Glandular Volume of the Peripheral Zone as Novel Pre-Biopsy Biometric Parameters: A Retrospective Pilot Study.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
- A comprehensive scoring system integrating clinical and radiological variables for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer on bi-parameter MRI: multi-center comparison with multi-parametric MRI.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot PI-RADS Version 2.1 Scoring with ChatGPT-4 Turbo and Llama 3: Diagnostic Performance and Agreement with Abdominal Radiologists.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2026Article
- Incremental value of prostate-specific antigen density beyond PI-RADS and conventional MRI features for predicting the highest ISUP grade group in patients with prostate cancer diagnosed at initial systematic prostate biopsy.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
- A multi-center study: development and validation of a BpMRI focused model in transition zone PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions to detect clinically significant prostate cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Reevaluating prostate imaging-reporting and data system 3 lesions upgraded to 4: the emergence of a new subgroup?The British journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Toward a Refined PI-RADS: The Feasibility and Limitations of More Informative Metrics in Reviewing MRI Scans.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Comparison of biparameter and multiparameter MRI in detection of clinically significant prostate cancer across PSA stratifications.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy based on a noninvasive diagnostic strategy: a prospective single-center study.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Improved image quality and reduced acquisition time in prostate T2-weighted spin-echo MRI using a modified PI-RADS-adherent sequence.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- MRI characteristics predict risk of pathological upgrade in patients with ISUP grade group 1 prostate cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of PI-RADSv2.1 using multiparametric and biparametric MRI for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy.Japanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of mpMRI-derived nomograms for detecting prostate cancer in PI-RADS v2.1 upgraded and non-upgraded lesions.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background Data regarding the prospective performance of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 alone and in combination with quantitative MRI features for prostate cancer detection is limited. Purpose To assess lesion-based clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) rates in different PI-RADS version 2.1 categories and to identify MRI features that could improve csPCa detection. Materials and Methods This single-center prospective study included men with suspected or known prostate cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI and MRI/US-guided biopsy from April 2019 to December 2021. MRI scans were prospectively evaluated using PI-RADS version 2.1. Atypical transition zone (TZ) nodules were upgraded to category 3 if marked diffusion restriction was present. Lesions with an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade of 2 or higher (range, 1-5) were considered csPCa. MRI features, including three-dimensional diameter, relative lesion volume (lesion volume divided by prostate volume), sphericity, and surface to volume ratio (SVR), were obtained from lesion contours delineated by the radiologist. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted at the lesion and participant levels to determine features associated with csPCa. Results In total, 454 men (median age, 67 years [IQR, 62-73 years]) with 838 lesions were included. The csPCa rates for lesions categorized as PI-RADS 1 (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.