Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129483›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2023

Microbial Diversity Biased Estimation Caused by Intragenomic Heterogeneity and Interspecific Conservation of 16S rRNA Genes.

Piaopiao Pan, Yichao Gu, Dong-Lei Sun, Qinglong L Wu, Ning-Yi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cervicovaginal microbial features predictInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  11. Nested PCR to optimizeMicrobiology spectrum · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Application ofISME communications · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Genome assembly ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Piaopiao PanState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0001-3247-7511
Yichao GuState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0009-0001-6853-2252
Dong-Lei SunState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8222-3328
Qinglong L WuCenter for Evolution and Conservation Biology, Southern Marine Sciences and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou), Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1636-4928
Ning-Yi ZhouState Key Laboratory of Microbial Metabolism, Joint International Research Laboratory of Metabolic and Developmental Sciences, and School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-5750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 16S rRNA gene has been extensively used as a molecular marker to explore evolutionary relationships and profile microbial composition throughout various environments. Despite its convenience and prevalence, limitations are inevitable. Variable copy numbers, intragenomic heterogeneity, and low taxonomic resolution have caused biases in estimating microbial diversity. Here, analysis of 24,248 complete prokaryotic genomes indicated that the 16S rRNA gene copy number ranged from 1 to 37 in bacteria and 1 to 5 in archaea, and intragenomic heterogeneity was observed in 60% of prokaryotic genomes, most of which were below 1%. The overestimation of microbial diversity caused by intragenomic variation and the underestimation introduced by interspecific conservation were calculated when using full-length or partial 16S rRNA genes. Results showed that, at the 100% threshold, microbial diversity could be overestimated by as much as 156.5% when using the full-length gene. The V4 to V5 region-based analyses introduced the lowest overestimation rate (4.4%) but exhibited slightly lower species resolution than other variable regions under the 97% threshold. For different variable regions, appropriate thresholds rather than the canonical value 97% were proposed for minimizing the risk of splitting a single genome into multiple clusters and lumping together different species into the same cluster. This study has not only updated the 16S rRNA gene copy number and intragenomic variation information for the currently available prokaryotic genomes, but also elucidated the biases in estimating prokaryotic diversity with quantitative data, providing references for choosing amplified regions and clustering thresholds in microbial community surveys.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaArchaeaGenes, rRNAPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA geneinterspecific conservationintragenomic heterogeneitymicrobial diversity

Identifiers

PMID37129483
PMCPMC10231250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.