Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37129360›Full record

ArticleeLife2023

Applying causal discovery to single-cell analyses using CausalCell.

Yujian Wen, Jielong Huang, Shuhui Guo, Yehezqel Elyahu, Alon Monsonego, Hai Zhang, Yanqing Ding, Hao Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Transcriptome-wide root causal inference.PLoS computational biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Discovering Root Causal Genes with High Throughput Perturbations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  14. Transcriptome-Wide Root Causal Inference.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yujian Wen *Bioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Jielong Huang *Bioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Shuhui GuoBioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yehezqel ElyahuThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Alon MonsonegoThe Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Hai ZhangNetwork Center, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yanqing DingDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Hao ZhuBioinformatics Section, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7384-3840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Correlation between objects is prone to occur coincidentally, and exploring correlation or association in most situations does not answer scientific questions rich in causality. Causal discovery (also called causal inference) infers causal interactions between objects from observational data. Reported causal discovery methods and single-cell datasets make applying causal discovery to single cells a promising direction. However, evaluating and choosing causal discovery methods and developing and performing proper workflow remain challenges. We report the workflow and platform CausalCell (http://www.gaemons.net/causalcell/causalDiscovery/) for performing single-cell causal discovery. The workflow/platform is developed upon benchmarking four kinds of causal discovery methods and is examined by analyzing multiple single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets. Our results suggest that different situations need different methods and the constraint-based PC algorithm with kernel-based conditional independence tests work best in most situations. Related issues are discussed and tips for best practices are given. Inferred causal interactions in single cells provide valuable clues for investigating molecular interactions and gene regulations, identifying critical diagnostic and therapeutic targets, and designing experimental and clinical interventions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSingle-Cell AnalysisCausalityGene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, RNAcausal analysiscausal relationshipcomputational biologyfeature selectionhumanmousenetwork inferencescRNA-seqsingle-cell analysissystems biology

Identifiers

PMID37129360
PMCPMC10229139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.