Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128875›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2023

Diagnostic Performance of a Tablet Computer-Based Cognitive Screening Test for Identification of Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Seunghee Na, Eek-Sung Lee, Tae-Kyeong Lee

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seunghee NaDepartment of Neurology, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8578-8578
Eek-Sung LeeDepartment of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea. eeksung@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3517-8207
Tae-Kyeong LeeDepartment of Neurology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6913-4689
Soonchunhyang University · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

Korea Health Industry Development Institute HI19C1132National Research Foundation of Korea 2019R1C1C1006539Soonchunhyang University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly and appropriate diagnosis of amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) is clinically important because aMCI is considered the prodromal stage of dementia caused by Alzheimer's disease (AD). aMCI is assessed using the comprehensive neuropsychological (NP) battery, but it is rater-dependent and does not provide quick results. Thus, we investigated the performance of the computerized cognitive screening test (Inbrain Cognitive Screening Test; Inbrain CST) in the diagnosis of aMCI and compared its performance to that of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD) test (CERAD-K), a comprehensive and pencil-and-paper NP test.

methodsA total of 166 participants were included in this cross-sectional study. The participants were recruited as part of a prospective, community-based cohort study for MCI (PREcision medicine platform for mild cognitive impairment on multi-omics, imaging, evidence-based R&BD; PREMIER). All participants were assessed using the CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST. The Inbrain CST comprised seven subtests that assessed the following five cognitive domains: attention, language, visuospatial, memory, and executive functions. Seventy-six participants underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging and [

resultsOf the 166 participants, 93 were diagnosed with aMCI, while 73 were cognitively unimpaired. The sensitivity of the Inbrain CST for aMCI diagnosis was 81.7%, and its specificity was 84.9%. Positive and negative predictive values were 87.4% and 78.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 83.1%, and the error rate was 16.9%. Demographic and clinical characteristics between individuals with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST and CERAD-K were not significantly different. The frequency of positive amyloid PET scan, the hippocampal/parahippocampal volumes, and AD signature cortical thickness did not differ between the patients with aMCI defined by CERAD-K and those with aMCI defined by the Inbrain CST.

conclusionThe Inbrain CST showed sufficient sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for diagnosing objective memory impairment in aMCI. In addition, aMCI patients identified by CERAD-K and the Inbrain CST showed comparable clinical and neuroimaging characteristics. Therefore, the Inbrain CST can be considered an alternative test to supplement the limitations of existing pencil-and-paper NP tests.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseCognitive DysfunctionCognitionCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNeuropsychological TestsProspective StudiesAlzheimer DiseaseAmnestic Mild Cognitive ImpairmentComputerized Cognitive TestNeurocognitive Test

Identifiers

PMID37128875
PMCPMC10151617
OpenAlexW4366316487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.