ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2023
Clinical experience in the use of 3D printing as a rapid replacement of traditional radiation therapy immobilization materials.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling and Evaluation of Customizable Immobilization Masks for Precision Radiotherapy.Polymers · 2026Article
- Analysis of the application of 3D-printed personalized positioning fixation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Clinical experience in the use of 3D printing as a rapid replacement of traditional radiation therapy immobilization materials.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePatient positioning and immobilization devices are commonly employed in radiation therapy. Unfortunately, cases can arise where the devices need to be reconstructed or improved. This work describes clinical processes to use a planning CT, to design and 3D print immobilization devices for reproducible patient positioning within a clinically feasible time frame when traditional methods can no longer be used or are insufficient. MATERIALS/
methodsThree clinical cases required rapid 3D printing of an immobilization device mid-treatment due to the following: (1) a lost headrest cushion, (2) needed improvement in lumbar spine positioning, and (3) a partially deflated vacuum immobilization mattress.
resultsIn the three cases, the 3D printed immobilization devices were clinically implemented successfully; two of the devices were fully designed and printed in 1 day. The 3D printed immobilization devices achieved a positioning accuracy sufficient to avoid the necessity to repeat the simulation and planning process.
conclusionIf traditional immobilization devices fail or are misplaced, it is feasible to have a 3D printed replacement within the time span of 1 day. The design and fabrication methods, as well as the experiences gained, are described in detail to assist clinicians to implement 3D printing for similar situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.