Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128642›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2023

Assessment of the physical dependence potential of difelikefalin: Randomized placebo-controlled study in patients receiving hemodialysis.

Robert H Spencer, Catherine Munera, Megan J Shram, Frédérique Menzaghi

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Clinical Research Progress on Using κ-Opioid Receptor Agonists to Treat Uremic Pruritus].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Robert H SpencerCara Therapeutics, Inc., Stamford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6435-9707
Catherine MuneraCara Therapeutics, Inc., Stamford, Connecticut, USA.
Megan J ShramAltreos Research Partners, Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Frédérique MenzaghiCara Therapeutics, Inc., Stamford, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3584-1665
Cara Therapeutics (United States) · USAltrecht GGZ · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Difelikefalin is a selective kappa opioid receptor agonist approved for treating moderate-to-severe pruritus in adults undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Difelikefalin is not a controlled substance under the Controlled Substances Act. This study assessed the potential for developing physical dependence on difelikefalin in patients undergoing HD. Eligible patients received open-label difelikefalin after each dialysis session for 3 weeks before entering a 2-week double-blind phase, when they were randomized to either continue difelikefalin or to switch to receiving placebo. Signs of physical withdrawal were assessed using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS), several patient-reported scales, and physiological measures. The primary end point was the between-group difference in mean maximum COWS total scores during the double-blind phase; the mean difference (placebo - difelikefalin) was compared against a predefined noninferiority limit (+4). Thirty-five patients (57.1% male; 91.4% Black or African American; median [range] age 58 [28-77] years) were included, of which 30 were randomized (placebo, n = 14; difelikefalin, n = 16). The least squares mean difference in maximum COWS total scores was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.56, 1.59). The upper CI limit (1.59) was below +4, indicating that patients who discontinued difelikefalin (placebo group) had similar withdrawal scores to patients who continued difelikefalin. Additional assessments supported the COWS results, showing no meaningful differences between groups in physiological measures or in patient-reported measures of sleep or physical withdrawal. These results demonstrate that abruptly discontinuing chronic difelikefalin treatment in patients undergoing HD does not produce signs or symptoms of physical withdrawal.

Indexed as

PiperidinesRenal DialysisAdultAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSleepTreatment OutcomedifelikefalinPiperidines

Identifiers

PMID37128642
PMCPMC10499405
OpenAlexW4367669342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.