Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128565›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

"Smart Knee Implants: An Overview of Current Technologies and Future Possibilities".

Edgars Kelmers, Agata Szuba, Samuel W King, Jeya Palan, Steven Freear, Hemant G Pandit, Bernard H van Duren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Porous Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Load Sensing of Total Knee Replacement.IEEE/ASME transactions on mechatronics : a joint publication of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society and the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division · 2026
    Article
  5. Current developments in orthopaedic implant technology.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Edgars KelmersInstitute of Medical and Biological Engineering (iMBE), University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5133-4700
Agata SzubaMedical Technologies Innovation and Knowledge Centre, Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.
Samuel W KingLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7900-0174
Jeya PalanLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9859-274X
Steven FreearSchool of Electronic an Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7858-4155
Hemant G PanditLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7392-8561
Bernard H van DurenLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine (LIRMM), University of Leeds, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Chapeltown Road, Leeds, LS7 4SA UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1877-8227

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This article focuses on clinical implementation of smart knee implants for total knee replacement and the future development of smart implant technology. With the number of total knee replacements undertaken growing worldwide, smart implants incorporating embedded sensor technology offer opportunity to improve post-operative recovery, reducing implant failure rates, and increasing overall patient satisfaction. Methods: A literature review on smart implants, historical prototypes, current clinically available smart implants, and the future potential for conventional implant instrumentation with embedded sensors and electronics was undertaken. Results: The overview of current and future technology describes use cases for various diagnostic and therapeutic treatment solutions. Conclusion: Smart knee implants are at an early development stage, with the first generation of smart implants being available to patients and with more novel technologies under development.

Indexed as

Active implantsInstrumented implantsSensorsSmart implantsTKATKR

Identifiers

PMID37128565
PMCPMC10147863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.