Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128560›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023

Is There a Scope for an Open Source Philosophy in Robotic Joint Replacement?: Why and How to Make Robotic Platforms Common and Universal for All Implants !

Vaibhav Bagaria, Murali Poduval

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vaibhav BagariaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir H N Reliance Foundation Hospital and Research Centre, Girgaum, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400004 India.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-3485
Murali PoduvalTata Consultancy Services, Unit 129/130, SDF V, SEEPZ, Andheri East, Mumbai, 400093 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Standardisation and open source technologies has transformed our world by levelling the field for innovation and improvisation. In the field of arthroplasty, we are seeing robotic technology make giant strides in terms of wide spread adoption across geographies. The benefits of consistency, reduced intra-surgeon and inter-surgeon variability as well as decreased dependence on complex instrumentation sets and large implant inventories, is a step in the right direction. However they suffer from a very significant drawback; today's robotic systems are essentially closed systems and do not offer cross platform and cross implant compatibility. Materials and Methods: This point of view dwells on why it is important that robotics become open source and how this can be achieved. A universal system of implant sizing and nomenclature is proposed. This may enable the use of Robotic platform across various commercially available implants seamlessly. Results: As of today, scientific literature and also the marketing literature provides no verifiable rationale for use of varied implant sizing terminology. The proposed universal implant sizing and nomenclature can be based on the Anteroposterior and mediolateral size data obtained from various anthropometric studies down across varied races. Conclusion: TBy building a consensus on the universal implant sizing nomenclature, the field of arthroplasty will achieve a major milestone. It will have benefits including easier documentation, storage and transmission of data. Most importantly, it will be the right step in direction of making the Robotic Technology - open source and thus making it available, accessible and affordable to all.

Indexed as

AlignmentAnthropometryKnee design rationaleOpen PlatformRoboticsUniversal Implant Sizing

Identifiers

PMID37128560
PMCPMC10147872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.