ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2023
Is There a Scope for an Open Source Philosophy in Robotic Joint Replacement?: Why and How to Make Robotic Platforms Common and Universal for All Implants !
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Standardisation and open source technologies has transformed our world by levelling the field for innovation and improvisation. In the field of arthroplasty, we are seeing robotic technology make giant strides in terms of wide spread adoption across geographies. The benefits of consistency, reduced intra-surgeon and inter-surgeon variability as well as decreased dependence on complex instrumentation sets and large implant inventories, is a step in the right direction. However they suffer from a very significant drawback; today's robotic systems are essentially closed systems and do not offer cross platform and cross implant compatibility. Materials and Methods: This point of view dwells on why it is important that robotics become open source and how this can be achieved. A universal system of implant sizing and nomenclature is proposed. This may enable the use of Robotic platform across various commercially available implants seamlessly. Results: As of today, scientific literature and also the marketing literature provides no verifiable rationale for use of varied implant sizing terminology. The proposed universal implant sizing and nomenclature can be based on the Anteroposterior and mediolateral size data obtained from various anthropometric studies down across varied races. Conclusion: TBy building a consensus on the universal implant sizing nomenclature, the field of arthroplasty will achieve a major milestone. It will have benefits including easier documentation, storage and transmission of data. Most importantly, it will be the right step in direction of making the Robotic Technology - open source and thus making it available, accessible and affordable to all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.