ArticleCureus2023
Evaluation of Bond Strength of Resin and Non-resin Cements to Different Alloys.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA strong metal-cement bond is one of the many factors that contribute to the clinical success of a fixed prosthesis. Even though it is crucial to create ideal resistance and retention forms during tooth preparation, dental cement must be strong enough to hold the restoration in place in the mouth. The present study set out to evaluate and compare the binding strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement, resin cement, and glass ionomer cement to four different metal alloys: titanium alloy, cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloy, nickel-chromium (Ni-Cr) alloy, and noble metal alloys (silver palladium based).
methodsTwo hundred and forty metal alloy specimens were created; these were fashioned from (i) a noble metal alloy (silver-palladium based), (ii) a titanium alloy, (iii) a cobalt-chromium alloy, and (iv) a nickel-chromium alloy. A universal testing machine was used to perform the shear test, and statistical analysis of the result was done using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Bonferroni test. Results:
conclusionThe results demonstrate that resin cement offers a stronger bond, followed by resin-modified GIC and GIC. The Co-Cr alloy had the highest shear bond strength, followed by Ni-Cr, titanium, and noble metal alloy which showed significantly lower shear strength than the other three alloys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.