Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128461›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022

Deep Learning vs Traditional Models for Predicting Hospital Readmission among Patients with Diabetes.

Ameen A Hai, Mark G Weiner, Anuradha Paranjape, Alice Livshits, Jeremiah R Brown, Zoran Obradovic, Daniel J Rubin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ameen A HaiCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Philadelphia, PA.
Mark G WeinerWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Anuradha ParanjapeLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Alice LivshitsLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Jeremiah R BrownDepartments of Epidemiology and Biomedical Data Science, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH.
Zoran ObradovicCenter for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, Philadelphia, PA.
Daniel J RubinLewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.
Temple University · USCornell University · USDartmouth College · US

Funding

Developing and validating EHR-integrated readmission risk prediction models for hospitalized patients with diabetesR01DK122073 · NIDDK · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI RUBIN, DANIEL J · 2020 to 2024
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK122073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hospital readmission risk prediction tool for patients with diabetes based on electronic health record (EHR) data is needed. The optimal modeling approach, however, is unclear. In 2,836,569 encounters of 36,641 diabetes patients, deep learning (DL) long short-term memory (LSTM) models predicting unplanned, all-cause, 30-day readmission were developed and compared to several traditional models. Models used EHR data defined by a Common Data Model. The LSTM model Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) was significantly greater than that of the next best traditional model [LSTM 0.79 vs Random Forest (RF) 0.72, p<0.0001]. Experiments showed that performance of the LSTM models increased as prior encounter number increased up to 30 encounters. An LSTM model with 16 selected laboratory tests yielded equivalent performance to a model with all 981 laboratory tests. This new DL model may provide the basis for a more useful readmission risk prediction tool for diabetes patients.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDiabetes MellitusHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPatient ReadmissionROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID37128461
PMCPMC10148287
OpenAlexW4367669633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.