ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022
Design, Implementation, and Usability of the Electronic Medical Record Search Engine (EMERSE) Tool.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Free text forms of clinical documentation stored in electronic health records contain a trove of data for researchers and clinicians alike. However, often these data are challenging to use and not easily accessible. EMERSE, a clinical documentation search and data abstraction tool developed by the University of Michigan, helps users in the task of searching through free text notes in clinical documentation. This study evaluates the usability and user experience of the EMERSE system, and draws inferences for the design of such systems. The study was conducted in 3 phases. In Phase 1, interviews with site administrators investigated factors that facilitate or hinder the implementation and adoption of EMERSE. Phase 2 employed semi-structured interviews to understand the uses, benefits, and limitations of the system from the perspective of experienced users. In Phase 3, system-naive users performed a set of basic workflow tasks, then completed post-activity questions and surveys to evaluate the intuitiveness and usability of the system. Participants rated the system exceptionally high on usability, user interface satisfaction, and perceived usefulness. Feedback also indicated that improvements could be made in visual contrast, affordances, and scope of notes indexed. These results indicate that tools such as EMERSE should be highly intuitive, attractive, and moderately customizable. This paper discusses some aspects of what may contribute to a system having such characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37128440PMC10148345What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.