Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128421›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022

Inferring EHR Utilization Workflows through Audit Logs.

Xinmeng Zhang, Yuying Zhao, Chao Yan, Tyler Derr, You Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xinmeng ZhangVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Yuying ZhaoVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Chao YanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Tyler DerrVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
You ChenVanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.

Funding

Discovering Care Coordination Practice Patterns in the EMR: Interpretation and Impact on Patient OutcomesR01LM012854 · NLM · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CHEN, YOU · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic health records (EHRs) usage and clinical workflows are intrinsically linked. To accommodate the complex care settings (e.g., emergency departments), EHR utilization workflows dynamically change in clinical practice, which in turn shapes the clinical workflows. Learning EHR workflows would provide an opportunity for healthcare organizations to enhance clinical workflows in the context of EHRs. However, very few studies investigated HER utilization workflows executed in clinical practice. We develop a network analysis framework and apply it to EHR audit logs to infer EHR workflows. We then measure the differences in the workflows between patient subgroups divided by races via differential network analysis. We apply our framework to trauma patients admitted to the emergency department, which is one of the clinical settings that need timely support from EHR utilizations. Our results show five core EHR workflows related to Narrator, Navigator, SmartTools, Chart Review, and ED workup activities in the ED. We find EHR workflows involving Narrator, SmartTools, and BPA are different when comparing patient subgroups.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHospitalizationEmergency Service, HospitalHumansWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37128421
PMCPMC10148376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.