Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37128389›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2022

Neural gradient boosting in federated learning for hemodynamic instability prediction: towards a distributed and scalable deep learning-based solution.

Francesca Manni, Aleksandr Bukharev, Anshul Jain, Shiva Moorthy, Asif Rahman, Anca Bucur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesca ManniPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Aleksandr BukharevPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Anshul JainPhilips Research PIC Bangalore, India.
Shiva MoorthyPhilips Research PIC Bangalore, India.
Asif RahmanPhilips Research North America, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Anca BucurPhilips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a privacy preserving approach to learning that overcome issues related to data access, privacy, and security, which represent key challenges in the healthcare sector. FL enables hospitals to collaboratively learn a shared prediction model without moving the data outside their secure infrastructure. To do so, after having sent model updates to a central server, an update aggregation is performed, and the model is sent back to the sites for further training. Although widely applied on neural networks, the deployment of FL architectures is lacking scalability and support for machine learning techniques such as decision tree-based models. The latter, when embedded in FL, suffer from costly encryption techniques applied for sharing sensitive information such as the splitting decisions within the trees. In this work, we focus on predicting hemodynamic instability on ICU patients by enabling distributed gradient boosting in FL. We employ a clinical dataset from 25 hospitals generated based on the Philips eICU database and we design a FL pipeline that supports neural-based boosting models as well as conventional neural networks. This enhancement enables decision tree models in FL, which represent the state-of-the-art approach for classification tasks involving tabular clinical data. Comparable performances in terms of accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score have been reached when detecting hemodynamic instability in FL, and in a centralized setup. In summary, we demonstrate the feasibility of a scalable FL for detecting hemodynamic instability in ICU data, which preserves privacy and holds the deployment benefits of a neural-based architecture.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDatabases, FactualHemodynamicsHospitalsHumansMachine LearningPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID37128389
PMCPMC10148294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.